Signal, No Noise

August 29, 2010

Led by Germany, Manufacturing in Europe Is Stronger Than Expected

Filed under: Economy,Europe,Germany,Western Europe — mungurk @ 19:18

source

PARIS — Euro zone manufacturers met with unexpectedly strong demand for industrial goods in June, a report showed Tuesday, suggesting Germany’s export-driven factories will continue to strengthen output — even as the American economy slows and fears linger that the debt crisis could return to hamper the Continent’s recovery.

Eurostat reported from Luxembourg that industrial new orders in the 16 countries sharing the euro rose 2.5 percent in June from May, and 22.6 percent from June 2009. Excluding the volatile transportation-related sector, orders grew 1.6 percent from May. Demand for capital goods was the largest component of the increase, rising 5.3 percent in June.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected overall June orders to rise about 1.5 percent.

The report came as the German government said gross domestic product expanded 2.2 percent in the second quarter from the first quarter, confirming its earlier estimate, showing growth well above its European peers and the fastest pace of expansion since East and West Germany were reunified in 1990.

German exports rose 8.2 percent in the quarter, aided by the 12 percent decline in the euro against the dollar this year. That juggernaut performance helped the overall euro area economy to grow by 1 percent in the second quarter, Eurostat, the European Union’s statistics office, said Aug. 13, the fastest in four years.

“The upswing in Germany has much more solid basis than people thought,” Ralph Solveen, an economist at Commerzbank in Frankfurt, said. Overseas demand is still the main driver, he said, but investment in machinery and equipment has also risen, and even private consumption — which rose 0.6 percent for its first gain in a year — “is looking a little better.”

“There’s a good chance that we’ll see an ongoing recovery of the German economy,” Mr. Solveen said, “but we can’t be sure that will be true for all of Europe.

“And the pace of growth will likely slow, because what we’ve seen was at least partly a countermovement to the sharp drop after the Lehman Brothers shock, which might now run out,” he added, referring to the bankruptcy of the investment bank in September 2008 that is widely thought to have exacerbated the global financial crisis.

In the factory report, Eurostat also revised upward May’s figure to show a 4.1 percent rise from April, compared with the 3.8 percent rise it previously reported.

The data, which are seen as a leading indicator because they refer to orders received but not completed, added to the picture of a relatively solid economy, in line with Markit’s euro zone flash composite purchasing managers’ index Monday that showed services and manufacturing activity at 56.1 in August, down from 56.7 in July, but still above 50, the dividing line between growth and contraction.

The German Federal Statistics Office also reported Tuesday that the government deficit had reached 3.5 percent of G.D.P. in the first six months, above the 3 percent limit dictated by the so-called Maastricht criteria for membership in the euro.

While investors have little doubt that Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government, which projects the deficit will rise to 4.5 percent of G.D.P. this year, can handle its spending, the announcement served as a reminder of the precarious state of public finances across the Continent.

Like other European governments, Germany has said it will move aggressively to cut the gap, even at the risk that doing so will weigh on growth.

The debt concerns, which were partly allayed in May after aggressive intervention by European leaders and by the European Central Bank, have continued to simmer throughout the summer.

The yield on Greek 10-year government bonds has climbed back to around 10.9 percent, despite central bank purchases on the secondary market; that is down from the May 7 peak of 12.4 percent, but shows steady upward movement since their recent low of 6.1 percent on March 17.

German bond yields, on the other hand, fell to new lows. The 10-year bund fell to 2.18 percent from 2.28 Monday.

Mr. Solveen attributed the move to fears that the United States might fall back intorecession and expectations that major central banks would keep rates at ultralow levels for some time.

He said the main risks to the European economy were external, the possibility that Asian growth would slow substantially or that the United States would enter a double-dip recession. While the sovereign debt issue remains on the minds of investors, Mr. Solveen said, it was probable that it would remain subdued for the rest of this year.

One prominent economist, the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, argued Tuesday in a radio interview that the focus on deficit reduction was exaggeratedly counterproductive.

“Cutting back willy-nilly on high-return investments just to make the picture of the deficit look better is really foolish,” Bloomberg News quoted Mr. Stiglitz as telling RTE radio in Ireland.

“Because so many in Europe are focusing on the 3 percent artificial number, which has no reality and is just looking at one side of a balance sheet, Europe is at risk of going into a double-dip,” Mr. Stiglitz said.

August 24, 2010

Hacker’s Arrest Offers Glimpse Into Crime in Russia

Filed under: Eastern Europe,Europe,Financial Crimes,Russia — mungurk @ 09:19

source
By ANDREW E. KRAMER
Published: August 23, 2010

MOSCOW — On the Internet, he was known as BadB, a disembodied criminal flitting from one server to another selling stolen credit card numbers despite being pursued by the United States Secret Service.

And in real life, he was nearly as untouchable — because he lived inRussia.

BadB’s real name is Vladislav A. Horohorin, according to a statementreleased last week by the United States Justice Department, and he was a resident of Moscow before his arrest by the police in France during a trip to that country earlier this month.

He is expected to appear soon before a French court that will decide on his potential extradition to the United States, where Mr. Horohorin could face up to 12 years in prison and a fine of $500,000 if he is convicted on charges of fraud and identity theft. For at least nine months, however, he lived openly in Moscow as one of the world’s most wanted computer criminals.

The seizing of BadB provides a lens onto the shadowy world of Russian hackers, the often well-educated and sometimes darkly ingenious programmers who pose a recognized security threat to online commerce — besides being global spam nuisances — who often seem to operate with relative impunity.

Law enforcement groups in Russia have been reluctant to pursue these talented authors of Internet fraud, for reasons, security experts say, of incompetence, corruption or national pride. In this environment, BadB’s network arose as “one of the most sophisticated organizations of online financial criminals in the world,” according to a statement issued by Michael P. Merritt, the assistant director of investigations for the Secret Service, which pursues counterfeiting and some electronic financial fraud.

As long ago as November 2009, the United States attorney’s office in Washington, in a sealed indictment, identified BadB as Mr. Horohorin, a 27-year-old residing in Moscow with dual Ukrainian and Israeli citizenship.

But it was not until Aug. 7 this year that Mr. Horohorin, who was traveling from Russia to France, was detained on a warrant from the United States as he boarded a plane to return to Russia at an airport in Nice, in southern France.

The Secret Service released a statement on Aug. 11, when the indictment was unsealed. Max Milien, a Secret Service spokesman in Washington, said the agency could not comment about the decision to arrest Mr. Horohorin in France.

Olga K. Shklyarova, spokeswoman for the Russian bureau of Interpol, said no American law enforcement agency had requested Mr. Horohorin’s arrest in her country. “We never received such a request,” she said by telephone.

According to the Secret Service statement, Mr. Horohorin managed Web sites for hackers who were able to steal large numbers of credit card numbers that were sold online anonymously around the globe. Those buyers would do the more dangerous work of running up fraudulent bills.

The numbers were exchanged on Web sites called CarderPlanet — carder.su and badb.biz— according to the Secret Service, and payment was made indirectly through accounts at a Russian online settlement system known as Webmoney, an analogue to PayPal.

Underscoring the nationalistic tone of much of Russian computer crime, one site featured a cartoon of the Russian prime minister, Vladimir V. Putin, awarding medals to Russian hackers. “We awaiting you to fight the imperialism of the U.S.A.” the site said, in approximate English.

Mr. Horohorin lived openly in Moscow. As a foreign citizen, he registered with the police, according to Dmitri Zakharov, a spokesman for the Russian Association of Electronic Communication, an industry lobby for legitimate Russian Internet businesses, who cited a database of such registries.

A phone number for Mr. Horohorin was out of service Thursday.

Arrests in Russia for computer crimes are rare, even when hackers living in Russia have been publicly identified by outside groups, like Spamhaus, a nonprofit group in Geneva and in London that tracks sources of spam.

The F.B.I. in 2002 resorted to luring a Russian suspect, Vasily Gorshkov, to the United States with a fake offer of a job interview (with a fictitious Internet company called Invita), rather than ask the Russian police for help. To obtain evidence in the case, F.B.I. computer experts had hacked into Mr. Gorshkov’s computer in Russia. When this was revealed, Russian authorities expressed anger that the F.B.I. had resorted to a cross-border tactic.

Online fraud is not a high priority for the Russian police, Mr. Zakharov said, because most of it is aimed at computer users in Europe or the United States. “This is a main reason why spammers are not arrested,” he said.

Politics may also play a role. Vladimir Sokolov, deputy director of the Institute of Information Security, a Russian research organization, said the United States and Russia were still at odds on basic issues of computer security, although the differences were narrowing.

The United States tends to view computer security as a law enforcement matter. Russia has pushed for an international treaty that would regulate the use of online weapons by military or espionage agencies. Last year the United States opened talks on a treaty, but it has continued to press for closer law enforcement cooperation, Mr. Sokolov said.

Computer security researchers have raised a more sinister prospect: that criminal spamming gangs have been co-opted by the intelligence agencies in Russia, which provide cover for their activities in exchange for the criminals’ expertise or for allowing their networks of virus-infected computers to be used for political purposes — to crash dissident Web sites, perhaps.

Sometimes, the collateral damage for online business is immediate. A year ago, for example, hackers used a network of infected computers to direct huge amounts of junk traffic at the social networking accounts of a 34-year-old political blogger in Georgia, a country that fought a war with Russia in 2008. The attack, though, spun out of control and briefly crashed the global service of Twitter and slowed Facebook and LiveJournal, affecting tens of millions of computer users worldwide.

The Russian authorities have repeatedly denied that the state has any connection to such attacks.

Spamhaus says 7 of the top 10 spammers in the world are based in the former Soviet Union, in Ukraine, Russia and Estonia.

More ominously, Western law enforcement agencies have traced a code intended for breaking into banking sites to Russian programming.

In 2007, Swedish experts identified a Russian hacker known only by his colorful sobriquet — the Corpse — as the author of a virus that logged keystrokes on personal computers to capture passwords for Nordea, a Swedish bank, and the accounts were drained of about $1 million.

For a time, these rogue programs were openly for sale on a Russian Web site. The home page displayed an illustration of Lenin making a rude gesture.

Since Mr. Horohorin’s arrest, the badb.biz Web site has gone dark. But through Monday, at least, its CarderPlanet counterpart, the Russian site carder.su, was still open for business.

August 21, 2010

‘Exploding Lake’ Provides Electrical Power for Rwanda

Filed under: Africa,Economy,Physical,Rwanda — mungurk @ 00:17

source

Analysis by Zahra Hirji
Wed Aug 18, 2010 08:52 PM ET

3987266063_dbfacb5806Rwanda is centering its new energy plan on an unlikely, potentially dangerous source: Lake Kivu.

At first glance, the lake’s placid blue waters appear harmless enough (shown to the left). But beneath its beautiful exterior lie huge reservoirs of methane and carbon dioxide that, if released onto the surface, would endanger the two million people living around its shores.

Kivu is one of the three known “erupting” lakes in the world. Only a stone’s throw away from Nyurangongo volcano, the lake has thousands of years worth of dissolved volcanic gases trapped in its waters.

It’s a ticking time bomb, but one with a silver lining. Rwanda’s government recently built the Kibuye power plant along the lake’s shore, which siphons off the noxious gases and uses the methane as fuel for three large generators.

Currently, the plant produces 3.6 megawatts of electricity, enough to power more than 4 percent of the country. The government hopes that within two years, the plant will be covering a third of the country’s needs.

The end goal is for Kivu, a lake that has long been a source of fear for the surrounding residents, to be the country’s primary source of power.

“Our grandfathers knew that there was gas in this lake, but now we have proved that it can be exploited. It’s a cheap, clean resource that could last us up to 100 years,” Alexis Kabuto, head engineer of the Kibuye project, told The Guardian in an interview.

So far, the pilot program has run smoothly. But people are still worried about the lake overturning, especially if regional temperatures keep rising.

Kivu is completely stratified, meaning there is no mixing between the lake’s warm, upper layer and the deep, colder layer. When gases enter the lake, they dissolve and migrate down to the denser, deep layer. The temperature and density differences act as a cap, preventing the gases from escaping back up to the surface.

But warming air temperatures could disrupt the cap by reducing the temperature difference between the two layers. The effect would be like opening a soda bottle; all those dissolved gases would fizz up to the surface in one big rush.

It’s happened before, with dire consequences. On August 15, 1984, Cameroon’s Lake Nyos erupted. The overturning unleashed a huge white cloud of highly-concentrated carbon dioxide onto the surrounding countryside. Hundreds of people and animals instantly suffocated.

What happened in Nyos is nothing compared to what could happen in Kivu, a much larger lake with more people living around it.

To prevent another eruption at Nyos, the Cameroon government built pipes that provide an outlet to regularly release gases from the deep. This prevents the gases from building up to toxic levels.

Rwanda’s power plant is a win-win. It essentially plays the same mitigating role as Nyos’ pipe system, and the planned expansion could have the added bonus of providing the lake’s residents with a huge source of power from relatively clean-burning natural gas.

http://news.discovery.com/earth/rwanda-harnesses-energy-from-exploding-lake.html

August 17, 2010

U.S. Said to Plan Easing Rules for Travel to Cuba

source

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is planning to expand opportunities for Americans to travel to Cuba, the latest step aimed at encouraging more contact between people in both countries, while leaving intact the decades-old embargo against the island’s Communist government, according to Congressional and administration officials.

The officials, who asked not to be identified because they had not been authorized to discuss the policy before it was announced, said it was meant to loosen restrictions on academic, religious and cultural groups that were adopted under President George W. Bush, and return to the “people to people” policies followed under President Bill Clinton.

Those policies, officials said, fostered robust exchanges between the United States and Cuba, allowing groups — including universities, sports teams, museums and chambers of commerce — to share expertise as well as life experiences.

Policy analysts said the intended changes would mark a significant shift in Cuba policy. In early 2009, President Obama lifted restrictions on travel and remittances only for Americans with relatives on the island.

Congressional aides cautioned that some administration officials still saw the proposals as too politically volatile to announce until after the coming midterm elections, and they said revisions could still be made.

But others said the policy, which does not need legislative approval, would be announced before Congress returned from its break in mid-September, partly to avoid a political backlash from outspoken groups within the Cuban American lobby — backed by SenatorRobert Menendez, Democrat of New Jersey — that oppose any softening in Washington’s position toward Havana.

Those favoring the change said that with a growing number of polls showing that Cuban-Americans’ attitudes toward Cuba had softened as well, the administration did not expect much of a backlash.

“They have made the calculation that if you put a smarter Cuba policy on the table, it will not harm us in the election cycle,” said one Democratic Congressional aide who has been working with the administration on the policy. “That, I think, is what animates this.”

Mr. Menendez, in a statement, objected to the anticipated changes. “This is not the time to ease pressure on the Castro regime,” he said, referring to President Raúl Castro of Cuba, who took office in 2006 after his brother, Fidel, fell ill. Mr. Menendez added that promoting travel would give Havana a “much needed infusion of dollars that will only allow the Castro brothers to extend their reign of oppression.”

In effect, the new policy would expand current channels for travel to Cuba, rather than create new ones. Academic, religious and cultural groups are now allowed to travel under very tight rules. For example, students wanting to study in Cuba are required to stay at least 10 weeks. And only accredited universities can apply for academic visas.

Under the new policy, such restrictions would be eased, officials said. And academic institutions, including research and advocacy groups and museums, would be able to seek licenses for as long as two years.

In addition, the administration is also planning to allow flights to Cuba from more cities than the three — Miami, New York and Los Angeles — currently permitted. And there are proposals, the officials said, to allow all Americans to send remittances or charitable donations to churches, schools and human rights groups in Cuba.

Some analysts said the measures were partly a response to pressure from an unlikely alliance of liberal political groups and conservative business associations — led by SenatorJohn Kerry, head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee — who have been pushing Congress to lift all restrictions on travel to Cuba.

Others described it as a nod to President Castro’s stunning decision last month to begin releasing dozens of political prisoners.

“It’s a way of fostering greater opening and exchange without a bruising battle with a much-needed political ally in an election year,” said Christopher Sabatini, senior policy director at the Council of the Americas. “But it can still be legitimately couched as a way of supporting democracy and human rights by allowing independent exchange and thought.”

As with everything concerning Cuba, the new policy seems fraught with complications. President Obama, who came to office promising to open new channels of engagement with Cuba, has so far had limited those new openings to Cuban-Americans, partly because of political concerns, and also because his administration’s attention had been focused on more pressing foreign policy matters, including two wars.

“I don’t think the administration believes this will produce palpable change in the short term,” said Julia Sweig of the Council on Foreign Relations. “But it’s a way over the long term to allow Americans and Cubans to have contact, even as their governments continue to hash out a lot of seriously thorny issues.”

High on the United States’ list of issues is winning the release of an American contractor who was detained in Cuba nine months ago when the authorities said they caught him distributing satellite telephones to Jewish dissidents. The contractor, Alan P. Gross, had gone to Cuba without the proper visa as part of longstanding program by the organizationUsaid, in which development workers conduct activities aimed at strengthening groups that oppose the Castro government.

“We’re dealing with a relationship that’s so contorted, it would take another 50 years of incremental steps to pull it apart and reassemble it in a constructive way,” said Robert Pastor, a professor of international relations at American University. “Even then, we’re having trouble taking baby steps, when what we need is a giant leap.”

August 16, 2010

China Passes Japan as Second-Largest Economy

Filed under: Asia,China,East Asia,Economy,Japan — mungurk @ 08:39

source

SHANGHAI — After three decades of spectacular growth, China passed Japan in the second quarter to become the world’s second-largest economy behind the United States, according to government figures released early Monday.

The milestone, though anticipated for some time, is the most striking evidence yet that China’s ascendance is for real and that the rest of the world will have to reckon with a new economic superpower.

The recognition came early Monday, when Tokyo said that Japan’s economy was valued at about $1.28 trillion in the second quarter, slightly below China’s $1.33 trillion. Japan’s economy grew 0.4 percent in the quarter, Tokyo said, substantially less than forecast. That weakness suggests that China’s economy will race past Japan’s for the full year.

Experts say unseating Japan — and in recent years passing Germany, France and Great Britain — underscores China’s growing clout and bolsters forecasts that China will pass the United States as the world’s biggest economy as early as 2030. America’s gross domestic product was about $14 trillion in 2009.

“This has enormous significance,” said Nicholas R. Lardy, an economist at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. “It reconfirms what’s been happening for the better part of a decade: China has been eclipsing Japan economically. For everyone in China’s region, they’re now the biggest trading partner rather than the U.S. or Japan.”

For Japan, whose economy has been stagnating for more than a decade, the figures reflect a decline in economic and political power. Japan has had the world’s second-largest economy for much of the last four decades, according to the World Bank. And during the 1980s, there was even talk about Japan’s economy some day overtaking that of the United States.

But while Japan’s economy is mature and its population quickly aging, China is in the throes of urbanization and is far from developed, analysts say, meaning it has a much lower standard of living, as well as a lot more room to grow. Just five years ago, China’s gross domestic product was about $2.3 trillion, about half of Japan’s.

This country has roughly the same land mass as the United States, but it is burdened with a fifth of the world’s population and insufficient resources.

Its per capita income is more on a par with those of impoverished nations like Algeria, El Salvador and Albania — which, along with China, are close to $3,600 — than that of the United States, where it is about $46,000.

Yet there is little disputing that under the direction of the Communist Party, China has begun to reshape the way the global economy functions by virtue of its growing dominance of trade, its huge hoard of foreign exchange reserves and United States government debt and its voracious appetite for oil, coal, iron ore and other natural resources.

China is already a major driver of global growth. The country’s leaders have grown more confident on the international stage and have begun to assert greater influence in Asia, Africa and Latin America, with things like special trade agreements and multibillion dollar resource deals.

“They’re exerting a lot of influence on the global economy and becoming dominant in Asia,” said Eswar S. Prasad, a professor of trade policy at Cornell and former head of theInternational Monetary Fund’s China division. “A lot of other economies in the region are essentially riding on China’s coat tails, and this is remarkable for an economy with a low per capita income.”

In Japan, the mood was one of resignation. Though increasingly eclipsed by Beijing on the world stage, Japan has benefited from a booming China, initially by businesses moving production there to take advantage of lower wages and, as local incomes have risen, by tapping a large and increasingly lucrative market for Japanese goods.

Beijing is also beginning to shape global dialogues on a range of issues, analysts said; for instance, last year it asserted that the dollar must be phased out as the world’s primary reserve currency.

And while the United States and the European Union are struggling to grow in the wake of the worst economic crisis in decades, China has continued to climb up the economic league tables by investing heavily in infrastructure and backing a $586 billion stimulus plan.

This year, although growth has begun to moderate a bit, China’s economy is forecast to expand about 10 percent — continuing a remarkable three-decade streak of double-digit growth.

“This is just the beginning,” said Wang Tao, an economist at UBS in Beijing. “China is still a developing country. So it has a lot of room to grow. And China has the biggest impact on commodity prices — in Russia, India, Australia and Latin America.”

There are huge challenges ahead, though. Economists say that China’s economy is too heavily dependent on exports and investment and that it needs to encourage greater domestic consumption — something China has struggled to do.

The country’s largely state-run banks have recently been criticized for lending far too aggressively in the last year while shifting some loans off their balance sheet to disguise lending and evade rules meant to curtail lending growth.

China is also locked in a fierce debate over its currency policy, with the United States, European Union and others accusing Beijing of keeping the Chinese currency, the renminbi, artificially low to bolster exports — leading to huge trade surpluses for China but major bilateral trade deficits for the United States and the European Union. China says that its currency is not substantially undervalued and that it is moving ahead with currency reform.

Regardless, China’s rapid growth suggests that it will continue to compete fiercely with the United States and Europe for natural resources but also offer big opportunities for companies eager to tap its market.

Although its economy is still only one-third the size of the American economy, China passed the United States last year to become the world’s largest market for passenger vehicles. China also passed Germany last year to become the world’s biggest exporter.

Global companies like Caterpillar, General ElectricGeneral Motors and Siemens — as well as scores of others — are making a more aggressive push into China, in some cases moving research and development centers here.

Some analysts, though, say that while China is eager to assert itself as a financial and economic power — and to push its state companies to “go global” — it is reluctant to play a greater role in the debate over climate change or how to slow the growth of greenhouse gases.

China passed the United States in 2006 to become the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases, which scientists link to global warming. But China also has an ambitious program to cut the energy it uses for each unit of economic output by 20 percent by the end of 2010, compared to 2006.

Assessing what China’s newfound clout means, though, is complicated. While the country is still relatively poor per capita, it has an authoritarian government that is capable of taking decisive action — to stimulate the economy, build new projects and invest in specific industries.

That, Mr. Lardy at the Peterson Institute said, gives the country unusual power. “China is already the primary determiner of the price of virtually every major commodity,” he said. “And the Chinese government can be much more decisive in allocating resources in a way that other governments of this level of per capita income cannot.”

June 3, 2010

Undersea oil pipelines vulnerable to hurricane damage

Filed under: Economy,Sea Space — mungurk @ 11:07

source

Undersea oil pipelines vulnerable to hurricanes

By Doyle Rice, USA TODAY
As the 2010 hurricane season officially got underway Tuesday, a new report said underwater oil pipelines in the Gulf are extremely vulnerable to strong currents and waves from the hurricanes that roar by above.

The findings, based on data obtained during Hurricane Ivan’s savage tear across the Gulf of Mexico in 2004, will appear in an upcoming edition of Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.

The study found that the 31,000 miles of pipelines along the seafloor of the Gulf could crack or rupture unless they are buried or their supporting foundations are built to withstand hurricane-induced currents. “Major oil leaks from damaged pipelines could have irreversible impacts on the ocean environment,” the authors wrote.

Researchers got a unique look at what a hurricane can do underwater during Ivan, a Category-4 hurricane with wind speeds of more than 130 mph in the Gulf. Ivan passed over a network of sensors on the ocean floor.

“This is the first time that anyone measured hurricane-induced stresses on the Gulf bottom,” says study author Bill Teague of the Naval Research Laboratory in Mississippi.

The study’s calculations are the first to show that hurricanes propel underwater currents with enough force to dig up the seabed as far as almost 300 feet below the surface, potentially creating underwater mudslides and damaging pipes and other equipment that rest on the bottom.

The research suggests hurricanes considerably weaker than Ivan could tear up the seafloor.

Ivan resulted in approximately 168 pipeline damage reports, but a minimal amount of oil was spilled, says a 2005 report commissioned by the Minerals Management Service (MMS), and prepared by Det Norske Veritas (DNV), a Norweigian risk-assessment company.

The study is not directly related to the BP oil spill fouling the Gulf of Mexico. “Our paper was submitted prior to the oil spill and coincidentally was accepted at about the time of the platform collapse,” Teague says.

The 2010 hurricane season is expected to be freakishly active, according to the federal National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. As many as 14 hurricanes are possible in the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea or Gulf of Mexico. A typical season sees about six hurricanes.

Hurricane damage to pipelines is not an unusual event.

There have been more than 1,000 reports of damage to Gulf oil pipelines over the past two decades, according to the 2005 MMS/DNV report.

Damages were reported from Hurricane Andrew in 1992, Hurricane Lili in 2002, Ivan in 2004 and from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005.

The most oil was spilled into the Gulf after Katrina and Rita. “As a result of both storms, 124 spills were reported with a total volume of roughly 17,700 barrels of total petroleum products,” the report says.

“Localized failures at pipeline crossings and excessive movements in shallow water depths suggest that more hurricane-resistant design considerations might be needed,” according to the 2005 MMS/DNV report.

The researchers were surprised by how long the destructive currents persisted after Hurricane Ivan passed by.

“The stress on the seafloor lasted nearly a week,” says Hemantha Wijesekera, lead author of the study, from the Naval Research Laboratory. “It doesn’t go away, even after the hurricane passes.”

Cyberattacks top threat to US power grid

Filed under: Americas,Cyberspace,Economy,North America,USA — mungurk @ 11:04

source

Cyberattacks seen as top threat to zap U.S. power grid

NERC report lists cyberattacks, pandemics and geomagnetic disturbances as top threats to North American electricity supply
By Ellen Messmer, Network World
June 02, 2010 12:05 AM ET

Cyber attacks, pandemics and electromagnetic disturbances are the three top “high impact” risks to the U.S. and Canadian power-generation grids, according to a report from the North American Electric Reliability Corp. (NERC).

“The specific concern with respect to these threats is the targeting of multiple key nodes in the system, if damaged, destroyed or interrupted in a coordinated fashion, could bring the system outside the protection provided by traditional planning and operating criteria,” states the report, “High-Impact, Low-Frequency Risk to the North American Bulk Power System.”

‘Cyber War’ author: U.S. needs radical changes to protect against attacks

The contents of the 118-page report are largely the result of closed-door discussions held since November by NERC (which plays a key role in setting security standards for the U.S. power grid),
power providers and U.S. government officials.

The report, which calls for better coordination between U.S. power-grid providers and the government, sets the stage for what may be new guidelines and processes required to combat the major threats identified, according to NERC officials.

The threat of a coordinated cyber attack, which might be combined with a physical attack, is considered the first of the top three “high-impact, low-frequency” threats to North American electricity supply, according to the report.

The electric power grid, on a daily basis, endures “hundreds of thousands of probes,” said Gerry Cauley, president and CEO of NERC, in a conference call to unveil the report. He noted there has been “suspicious activity around control systems.”

But NERC officials declined to confirm or deny past reports that spies have compromised the U.S. power grid with malicious code that would allow intruders to damage or otherwise interfere with safe operation of the grid.

However, the report does say “an intelligent attacker” could “mount an adaptive attack that would manipulate assets,” and possibly “provide misleading information to system operators attempting to address the issue.”
Cyber attacks would impede the grid’s operation, but the report suggests few details about possible defensive plans, except that there should be better “forensics tools and network architecture to support graceful degradation,” with an “eye toward designing for survivability.”

The report says: “Components and system design criteria should also be re-evaluated with respect to these threats and an eye toward designing for survivability. Prioritization of key assets for protection will be a critical component of a successful mitigation approach.”

Mark Lauby, director of reliability assessments at NERC, said the outfit is looking at “creating specific mitigation measures” and possible new standards to strengthen the power grid and its operation. Though NERC sources say there’s no specific timeframe for doing so.

The report provides few clear answers on how to combat any of the three named threats, including electromagnetic disturbance (said to originate in violent solar activity, or possibly “detonation of a large nuclear device,” or some kind of intentional electromagnetic interference that might target local power-grid elements).

In fact, the report points to some dismaying weaknesses in the U.S. power grid. “Many of these components are manufactured overseas, with little manufacturing capability remaining in North America,” the report states.

A pandemic is essentially a “people ” issue, the report notes. If large numbers of people fell sick to a disease, “less-experienced people” would have to operate the generation plants, the report says.
NERC does plan to identify “mitigation steps” to address these top risks, noting that any effective response will require close communication with federal agencies.

But the tone of the report is not highly optimistic.

“The first step,” the report says, is “acknowledgement that fully protecting the system from a coordinated attack is not possible,” noting “the bulk power system is literally comprised of hundreds of thousands of miles of high-voltage transmission lines,” and much more. Any defense is going to require “a strong mix of preventative measures built on the inherent resiliency of the system and preparatory measures that will enable system operators to recognize an attack and respond to it when it does occur.”

“The electric utilities have done very, very little to secure their power plants, substations and control centers,” says Joe Weiss, managing partner at engineering consultancy Applied Control Solutions, who has testified before Congress on the topic and contributed to the NERC report. Weiss says the NERC report is intended to “try and wake the utilities up,” and will most likely lead to greater regulation for them in terms of cybersecurity.

Today, says Weiss, “The standards out there for the electric-power industry are incredibly weak,” noting the report is looking at the possibility of events occurring that would “bring the power grid down for months.”

One idea put forward in the NERC report, having a security manager in power-plant environments who would be the main contact with a government liaison to communicate on serious security issues, is something Weiss said he would favor.

Weiss said he’s skeptical about this notion that somehow malicious code planted by spies has compromised electric-power plant control systems but he adds, “We have done very little forensics to even be able to know.”

March 18, 2010

South Korea Signs Agreement to Build Nuclear Plant in Turkey

source

POWERnews
A preliminary move on March 10 puts Turkey closer than ever to building its first nuclear power plant. The plant, which would consist of four reactors with a total 5,600 MW capacity, would be built in northern Turkey on the Black Sea coast.

Though details remain to be worked out, the protocol between two state-owned power companies—Korean Electric Power Corp. (KEPCO) and Elektrik Üretim (EUAS)—is big news for both countries. Turkey has long wanted a nuclear plant, but setbacks of various kinds, including financing problems and concern about earthquake faults, have thwarted all previous attempts at moving past the wishing stage. For its part, KEPCO has been actively working to develop plants beyond its home borders and has announced a goal of exporting 80 reactors, worth $400 billion, by 2030.

In an interview with the Financial Times, Turkish Energy Minister Taner Yildiz said he wanted nuclear power to generate 10% of his country’s electricity by 2020.

The Financial Times also reported that KEPCO and a Turkish construction group, Enka Insaat ve Sanayi, would form a 50-50 joint venture to construct the plant.

Though most news sources reported on the agreement as essentially a done deal, the Anatolia news agency quoted Yildiz as saying, “If any company from the United States, Canada, Japan, France makes a proposal, we are open to work similarly with them.”

Since January, Turkey has been working with the Russian Federation to build a nuclear plant in Akkuyu, in southern Turkey, on the Mediterranean. That project has been fraught with controversy from its original inception in 2000. Given KEPCO’s aggressive goals and schedules, it’s possible that its planned project could come online before the Russian one.

Sources: POWERnews, UPI, Today’s Zaman, Financial Times, AFP

March 17, 2010

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Powered by WordPress