Signal, No Noise

August 29, 2010

High-speed railways in south China to exceed 5,000 km by 2012

Filed under: Asia,China,East Asia,Infrastructure — mungurk @ 19:10

source

High-speed railways in south China to exceed 5,000 km by 2012

10:24, August 29, 2010

China will complete building 5,000 kilometers of high-speed railways in the mainland’s southern region by 2012 to accelerate its economic integration with the business vibrant Hong Kong and Macao, a senior industry official said Saturday.

The rail tracks, to be laid in the sprawling pan-Pearl Delta region which includes eight provinces and an ethnic autonomous region of the mainland, will account for nearly 40 percent of the country’ total in the coming three years.

Another 5,000 kilometers will be completed in the region from 2012 to 2015, said Lu Dongfu, vice minister of the Ministry of Railways, at the 6th Pan Pearl Delta Regional Cooperation and Development Forum held in Fuzhou, capital of southeast China’s Fujian Province.

Liu said the railway system played a key role in the region’s economic boom, transporting 386 million passengers and 521 million tons of goods in 2009, up 28.7 percent and 7.4 percent respectively from the figures in 2004.

He said after the additional high-speed railways are put into service the railway transport will be faster, safer and more comfortable.

China is investing heavily in the railway system to meet the demands of an increasing number of rush travelors. Authorities vow to cut the travel time between provincial capitals of neighboring provinces to less than two hours.

The pan-Pearl River Delta covers southern coastal provinces of Fujian, Guangdong, Hainan, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, inland provinces of Jiangxi, Yunnan, Guizhou and Sichuan, as well as Hong Kong and Macao special administrative regions.

The forum, running from Aug. 27 to 31, was attended by key government officials and a number of business people.

Source: Xinhua

August 16, 2010

China Passes Japan as Second-Largest Economy

Filed under: Asia,China,East Asia,Economy,Japan — mungurk @ 08:39

source

SHANGHAI — After three decades of spectacular growth, China passed Japan in the second quarter to become the world’s second-largest economy behind the United States, according to government figures released early Monday.

The milestone, though anticipated for some time, is the most striking evidence yet that China’s ascendance is for real and that the rest of the world will have to reckon with a new economic superpower.

The recognition came early Monday, when Tokyo said that Japan’s economy was valued at about $1.28 trillion in the second quarter, slightly below China’s $1.33 trillion. Japan’s economy grew 0.4 percent in the quarter, Tokyo said, substantially less than forecast. That weakness suggests that China’s economy will race past Japan’s for the full year.

Experts say unseating Japan — and in recent years passing Germany, France and Great Britain — underscores China’s growing clout and bolsters forecasts that China will pass the United States as the world’s biggest economy as early as 2030. America’s gross domestic product was about $14 trillion in 2009.

“This has enormous significance,” said Nicholas R. Lardy, an economist at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. “It reconfirms what’s been happening for the better part of a decade: China has been eclipsing Japan economically. For everyone in China’s region, they’re now the biggest trading partner rather than the U.S. or Japan.”

For Japan, whose economy has been stagnating for more than a decade, the figures reflect a decline in economic and political power. Japan has had the world’s second-largest economy for much of the last four decades, according to the World Bank. And during the 1980s, there was even talk about Japan’s economy some day overtaking that of the United States.

But while Japan’s economy is mature and its population quickly aging, China is in the throes of urbanization and is far from developed, analysts say, meaning it has a much lower standard of living, as well as a lot more room to grow. Just five years ago, China’s gross domestic product was about $2.3 trillion, about half of Japan’s.

This country has roughly the same land mass as the United States, but it is burdened with a fifth of the world’s population and insufficient resources.

Its per capita income is more on a par with those of impoverished nations like Algeria, El Salvador and Albania — which, along with China, are close to $3,600 — than that of the United States, where it is about $46,000.

Yet there is little disputing that under the direction of the Communist Party, China has begun to reshape the way the global economy functions by virtue of its growing dominance of trade, its huge hoard of foreign exchange reserves and United States government debt and its voracious appetite for oil, coal, iron ore and other natural resources.

China is already a major driver of global growth. The country’s leaders have grown more confident on the international stage and have begun to assert greater influence in Asia, Africa and Latin America, with things like special trade agreements and multibillion dollar resource deals.

“They’re exerting a lot of influence on the global economy and becoming dominant in Asia,” said Eswar S. Prasad, a professor of trade policy at Cornell and former head of theInternational Monetary Fund’s China division. “A lot of other economies in the region are essentially riding on China’s coat tails, and this is remarkable for an economy with a low per capita income.”

In Japan, the mood was one of resignation. Though increasingly eclipsed by Beijing on the world stage, Japan has benefited from a booming China, initially by businesses moving production there to take advantage of lower wages and, as local incomes have risen, by tapping a large and increasingly lucrative market for Japanese goods.

Beijing is also beginning to shape global dialogues on a range of issues, analysts said; for instance, last year it asserted that the dollar must be phased out as the world’s primary reserve currency.

And while the United States and the European Union are struggling to grow in the wake of the worst economic crisis in decades, China has continued to climb up the economic league tables by investing heavily in infrastructure and backing a $586 billion stimulus plan.

This year, although growth has begun to moderate a bit, China’s economy is forecast to expand about 10 percent — continuing a remarkable three-decade streak of double-digit growth.

“This is just the beginning,” said Wang Tao, an economist at UBS in Beijing. “China is still a developing country. So it has a lot of room to grow. And China has the biggest impact on commodity prices — in Russia, India, Australia and Latin America.”

There are huge challenges ahead, though. Economists say that China’s economy is too heavily dependent on exports and investment and that it needs to encourage greater domestic consumption — something China has struggled to do.

The country’s largely state-run banks have recently been criticized for lending far too aggressively in the last year while shifting some loans off their balance sheet to disguise lending and evade rules meant to curtail lending growth.

China is also locked in a fierce debate over its currency policy, with the United States, European Union and others accusing Beijing of keeping the Chinese currency, the renminbi, artificially low to bolster exports — leading to huge trade surpluses for China but major bilateral trade deficits for the United States and the European Union. China says that its currency is not substantially undervalued and that it is moving ahead with currency reform.

Regardless, China’s rapid growth suggests that it will continue to compete fiercely with the United States and Europe for natural resources but also offer big opportunities for companies eager to tap its market.

Although its economy is still only one-third the size of the American economy, China passed the United States last year to become the world’s largest market for passenger vehicles. China also passed Germany last year to become the world’s biggest exporter.

Global companies like Caterpillar, General ElectricGeneral Motors and Siemens — as well as scores of others — are making a more aggressive push into China, in some cases moving research and development centers here.

Some analysts, though, say that while China is eager to assert itself as a financial and economic power — and to push its state companies to “go global” — it is reluctant to play a greater role in the debate over climate change or how to slow the growth of greenhouse gases.

China passed the United States in 2006 to become the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases, which scientists link to global warming. But China also has an ambitious program to cut the energy it uses for each unit of economic output by 20 percent by the end of 2010, compared to 2006.

Assessing what China’s newfound clout means, though, is complicated. While the country is still relatively poor per capita, it has an authoritarian government that is capable of taking decisive action — to stimulate the economy, build new projects and invest in specific industries.

That, Mr. Lardy at the Peterson Institute said, gives the country unusual power. “China is already the primary determiner of the price of virtually every major commodity,” he said. “And the Chinese government can be much more decisive in allocating resources in a way that other governments of this level of per capita income cannot.”

June 13, 2010

Filed under: Asia,China,East Asia,Military,North Korea — mungurk @ 00:36

source

North Korean border guard ‘shoots three Chinese dead’

Page last updated at 10:33 GMT, Tuesday, 8 June 2010 11:33 UK

China-North Korea bridge The four were allegedly shot close to the countries’ borderChina says a North Korean border guard shot and killed three people near the countries’ border last week.

A fourth person was reportedly injured in the incident near the north-eastern border town of Dandong.

China has made a formal complaint to North Korea, a spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry said.

The two countries are considered to be close allies and Beijing rarely makes any public criticism of its isolated neighbour.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang told a regular news conference in Beijing that the four residents of Dandong, in Liaoning province, had been shot “on suspicion of crossing the border for trade activities”.

“China attaches great importance to that and has immediately raised a solemn representation with the DPRK,” he said, using North Korea’s full name (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea).

Close allyMr Qin said the case was being investigated, but gave no further details. Pyongyang has not commented on the accusations.

Illegal traders regularly cross the border between North Korea and China, taking black market goods into the impoverished country.

China is North Korea’s main trading partner and the country perceived to have the most influence on the state.

MapTensions on the Korean peninsula have been high since the sinking of a South Korean warship in March with the loss of 46 lives.

An international investigation blamed North Korea for the sinking, but China has resisted pressure to condemn its ally. Instead, it has urged both the Koreas to show restraint.

Last month, the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-il, was reported to have visited China to seek economic and political support.

China is crucial to North Korea’s fight for economic survival, providing Pyongyang with food, fuel and much-needed investment.

Beijing is also a participant in the six-party talks on North Korea’s nuclear programme. The talks have been going on since 2003 without much progress.

In 2009, North Korea detained two US journalists on the border with China, accusing them of entering North Korea illegally.

Laura Ling and Euna Lee, who said they were detained on the Chinese side, were sentenced to 12 years’ hard labour but were freed in August after four months in captivity, as part of a diplomatic mission spearheaded by former US President Bill Clinton.

A US man, Robert Park, was also arrested in December last year, after walking into North Korea across a frozen river. He was released in February.

June 12, 2010

US presses China to rein in N.Korea

Filed under: Asia,China,East Asia,Military,North Korea,South Korea,WMD — mungurk @ 23:07

source

US presses China to rein in N.Korea

By Shaun Tandon (AFP) – 2 days ago

WASHINGTON — The United States is pressing China to rein in North Korea, voicing “dismay” that the Asian power has not put more pressure on its ally as tensions build over the sinking of a South Korean warship.

China has offered condolences over the March sinking of the Cheonan but has not placed blame on North Korea, which has warned of “serious” consequences if the issue is brought before the United Nations Security Council.

Admiral Mike Mullen, the top US uniformed military officer, said late Wednesday that China needed to take a greater role after the purported torpedo attack, which claimed 46 lives in one of the deadliest incidents since the Korean War.

“I’ve been encouraged by public statements made recently by Chinese leadership as to the seriousness of this incident and the need for accountability and yet dismayed by a fairly tepid response to calls by the international community for support,” Mullen said.

Mullen, speaking at a dinner of the Asia Society, indicated that the United States would soon go ahead with military exercises with South Korea which were set for early June but delayed to give a chance for diplomacy with North Korea.

“We in the United States military stand firmly by our allies in the Republic of Korea and will move forward, in keeping with international agreements, to demonstrate that solidarity in coming weeks,” Mullen said.

“I think it’s of no surprise to anyone that we are planning maritime exercises to sharpen skills and strengthen collective defenses.”

South Korea has asked the Security Council to respond to the ship’s sinking and said Wednesday that investigators would brief the body’s 15 members on the probe at the request of council president Mexico.

Seoul’s Vice Foreign Minister Chun Yung-Woo returned Wednesday from a trip to lobby China but said that differences remained.

“We agreed to keep working toward reaching acceptable solutions, based on our strategic cooperative partnership,” Chun said.

North Korea’s UN representative wrote a letter to the council urging it not to be swayed by US “lies” as it was before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, according to state media.

The letter warned that if the warship probe was put on the council’s agenda, “no one would dare imagine how serious its consequences would be with regard to the peace and security on the Korean peninsula.”

Experts have speculated widely on North Korea’s motivations for the sinking, with some believing that the communist state is trying to show its mettle as part of the succession to leader Kim Jong-Il.

China’s relations are not always warm with North Korea, with Beijing saying Tuesday it protested after border guards from its neighbor shot dead three Chinese citizens.

But analysts believe that China’s main goal is stability as it fears the prospect of North Korean refugees flooding over the border or a unified Korea with US troops right on its border.

President Barack Obama’s administration has sought broader cooperation with China. But relations between the two militaries have remained uneasy, with Beijing declining Defense Secretary Robert Gates’s requests to visit.

Gates had a tense exchange on Saturday with a Chinese general at a security conference in Singapore.

Major General Zhu Chenghu asked Gates to explain what he called a contradiction between the US condemnation of North Korea and a more cautious US reaction to a deadly raid by Israel against a Gaza-bound aid ship.

“The Chinese military is the most provincial, and I would say the most xenophobic, element of the Chinese elite,” Jeffrey Bader, Obama’s top aide on Asia, told a forum this week.

China in January cut off military relations after the United States in January unveiled a 6.4-billion-dollar arms package to Taiwan, which Beijing claims as part of Chinese territory.

Copyright © 2010 AFP. All rights reserved.

China seeks more dialogue on Iran

Filed under: Asia,China,East Asia,Iran,Middle East — mungurk @ 23:06

source

China seeks more dialogue on Iran
Li, right, China’s UN envoy, said the vote aims to bring Iran back to negotiations [Reuters]

China, which voted for the UN Security Council resolution for tougher sanctions against Iran, has called for negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear programme, saying a diplomatic solution is still the better option.

China’s foreign ministry issued the call on Thursday, a day after Beijing helped pass the resolution targeting Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, ballistic missiles and nuclear-related investments.

Despite the sanctions, Qin Gang, a ministry spokesman, said the correct way to handle the nuclear stand-off is by diplomatic means.

“China always holds that the correct way to address the Iranian nuclear issue is through dialogue, negotiation and other diplomatic means to seek a solution that satisfies the concerns of all parties,” Qin said.

“The fact that the UN Security Council passed the resolution does not mean the door to diplomatic efforts is closed.”

His comments came as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, was due to arrive in China later on Thursday to tour the World Expo in Shanghai.

He is not expected to hold talks with senior Chinese leaders.

Intense lobbying

China had been a vocal opponent of a fourth round of sanctions against Iran for its nuclear programme.

But it chose to vote for the sanctions on Wednesday instead of exercising its veto power as one of five permanent members of the council.

Its support came about only in recent months after intense lobbying by the US and its allies.

Victor Gao, the director at the China National Association of International Studies, a government think-tank, told Al Jazeera that China’s decision to vote was mainly because the adopted resolution was a watered-down version that contains voluntary provisions.

“In this process China has repeatedly emphasised that ‘diplomacy, engagement and dialogue’ with Iran is a better solution, especially after Turkey and Brazil reached the agreement with Iran to swap nuclear materials,” he said.

“Furthermore, the key provisions in this resolution are voluntary … it basically creates a legal justification for countries who want to take those actions as specified in the resolution.”

Diplomatic aim

Gao said China has been consistent in opposing nuclear proliferation but at the same time has maintained that other countries, including Iran, should have the right to the peaceful use of nuclear material.

He said China has firmly opposed the nuclear programmes in both Iran and North Korea.

“Even today China is calling North Korea to discontinue its nuclear programme. It does not want to see nuclear proliferation programme either on the Korean peninsula or in the Middle East,” Gao said.

China, an ally of Iran and one of the Islamic republic’s major trading partners in recent years, was long reluctant to sign on to the sanctions.

Li Baodong, the Chinese ambassador to the UN, was quoted as saying by the official Xinhua news agency: “The new resolution is aimed at bringing Iran back to the negotiating table and activate a new round of diplomatic efforts.”

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies

May 23, 2010

Through UN, South Korea Seeking Damages Against North Korea in Cheonan Sinking

Filed under: Asia,China,East Asia,North Korea,South Korea — mungurk @ 22:13

source

South Korea to seek U.N. penalties for North Korea in Cheonan sinking

Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, May 24, 2010

BEIJING — South Korea said Sunday that it will ask the U.N. Security Council to punish North Korea for its deadly attack on a South Korean warship, a move that could ratchet up pressure on the isolated Stalinist regime and add a new flash point in U.S. relations with China.

South Korean President Lee Myung-bak will make the request in an address to his nation Monday during which he will detail a package of measures in response to the March 26 torpedoing of the 1,200-ton Cheonan and the killing of 46 sailors, said his spokesman Lee Dong-kwan.

A senior U.S. official, traveling with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in China, said the United States will back “all the steps the South Koreans are going to announce tomorrow.” In an indication of the seriousness with which the Obama administration views the unfolding drama between the North and the South, home to nearly 29,000 U.S. troops, he added: “We have not faced something like this in decades.”

Among other measures that could be pushed by Lee, analysts said, are cuts in South Korean trade with the North, returning North Korea to the U.S. State Department’s list of states that sponsor terrorism, and tighter U.N. sanctions on Pyongyang. Lee has apparently ruled out military action because he does not want to trigger an all-out war.

The official said that, based on talks over the past two days, Chinese officials have not accepted the results of a South Korean investigation — backed by experts from the United States, Australia, Britain and Sweden — that implicated North Korea in the attack. As such, it is unclear whether Beijing will support Lee’s call in the Security Council.

China’s reluctance to agree with the report underscores the challenges the United States faces as it seeks to forge closer ties to Beijing. The U.S. official also noted Sunday that China and the United States still do not see eye to eye on the details of planned economic sanctions on Iran for its failure to stop its nuclear enrichment program. Of specific concern, he said, are disagreements between Beijing and Washington about how investments in Iran’s oil and gas sector will be treated. China has committed to investing more than $80 billion in Iran’s energy sector; tightened sanctions against Tehran could threaten those investments.

U.S. officials said the Obama administration considers the situation in Northeast Asia and Iran so pressing that on Sunday night in Beijing, Clinton dispensed with the niceties of protocol and got down to a substantive discussion in the middle of a private banquet to welcome the biggest delegation of U.S. officials to Beijing to date. The officials — a band of 200 led by Clinton and Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and specializing in fields such as health, energy and the environment, counterterrorism, nuclear proliferation, and human rights — are in Beijing for the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue.

Reverberations in Tokyo

Officials and analysts said that the attack on the Cheonan seems to be redefining the security equation in Northeast Asia, bolstering the United States, damaging China and concentrating the minds of Japanese officials.

The attack has provided political cover for Japan’s government — only the second opposition party to take power in nearly 50 years — to end an eight-month-long feud with the United States and accept a plan to relocate a U.S. Marine base within Okinawa. On Sunday, Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama announced that his country would abide by a 14-year-old agreement with the United States to move the Futenma air base in Okinawa to a less populated part of the island. U.S. officials responded cautiously, however, because important details have yet to be ironed out.

Hatoyama’s government had campaigned on a platform that rejected the Futenma deal and advocated a more Asia-centric view of Japan’s place in the world. But the Cheonan incident reminded them “that this is still a very dangerous neighborhood and that the U.S.-Japan alliance and the basing arrangements that are part of that are critical to Japan’s security,” the senior U.S. official said.

Tough options for China

The attack and its aftermath also threaten China’s place in the region and could force it to make an unwanted choice between South Korea and North Korea — two countries that it has handled deftly since normalizing relations with Seoul in 1992. South Korea wants China, which is a permanent member of the Security Council, to back Seoul’s call to take the Cheonan issue to the council. So does the United States, the U.S. official said.

But that could risk hurting Pyongyang, and China appears committed to maintaining the North Korean regime above all.

“For China,” the U.S. official said, “they are in uncharted waters.”

China reacted slowly to the Cheonan’s sinking, waiting almost a month before offering South Korea condolences. Then it feted North Korean leader Kim Jong Il in early May, apparently offering him another large package of aid, Asian diplomats said. China’s attitude has enraged South Korean officials.

Michael Green, a national security official during George W. Bush’s administration, said the Cheonan crisis highlights just how differently China views its security needs than the rest of the players in Northeast Asia. For years, as China worked with the United States, Russia, South Korea and Japan to try to persuade North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons programs, these differences were obscured. But the Cheonan’s sinking has changed that.

While the incident is pushing officials in South Korea, Japan and the United States to contain North Korea and even prepare for a future without a North Korean state, Green said, China appears intent on redoubling its efforts to ensure North Korea’s stability.

“The Chinese are very negative about the prospect of a democratic, united Korea on their border,” Green said. “They want to keep North Korea alive.”

“This incident is going to drive the United States, South Korea and Japan closer together,” he said. “China won’t be happy.”

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao will travel to South Korea this week for a three-nation summit, which will also include Japan. The attack — and China’s reaction — is expected to dominate those talks.

May 20, 2010

Two Chinese Nationals Convicted of Illegally Exporting Electronics Components Used in Military Radar & Electronic Warfare

source

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, May 17, 2010
Two Chinese Nationals Convicted of Illegally Exporting Electronics Components Used in Military Radar & Electronic Warfare

Following a five-week trial, a federal jury in Massachusetts found two Chinese nationals, one of whom resided in the United States, guilty of illegally conspiring to violate U.S. export laws and illegally exporting electronic equipment from the United States to China, the Justice Department announced today. Several Chinese military entities were among those receiving the exported equipment.

The jury also convicted a Waltham, Mass., corporation, owned by one of the defendants, which procured the equipment from U.S. suppliers and then exported the goods to China through Hong Kong. The exported equipment is used in electronic warfare, military radar, fire control, military guidance and control equipment and satellite communications, including global positioning systems.

Zhen Zhou Wu aka Alex Wu, Yufeng Wei aka Annie Wei and Chitron Electronics Inc. (Chitron-US), were convicted of unlawfully exporting defense articles and Commerce controlled goods to China on numerous occasions between 2004 and 2007 and conspiring to violate U.S. export laws over a period of ten years. Wu and Wei were also both convicted of filing false shipping documents with the Commerce Department. In addition, Wei was convicted of immigration fraud for presenting a U.S. Permanent Resident Card, which she knew had been procured by making false and fraudulent statements to immigration officials, to enter the country.

“Today’s convictions demonstrate the importance of safeguarding America’s sensitive technology against illicit foreign procurement efforts. They also serve as a warning to those who seek to covertly obtain technological materials from the U.S. in order to advance military systems of their own. I applaud the many agents, analysts and prosecutors who helped bring about this successful outcome,” said David Kris, Assistant Attorney General for National Security.

Evidence presented at trial proved that the defendants illegally exported military electronic components, which are designated on the U.S. Munitions List, to mainland China, through Hong Kong, between April 2004 and June 2006. The defense articles the defendants illegally exported are primarily used in military phased array radar, electronic warfare, military guidance systems, and military satellite communications. Since 1990 the U.S. government has maintained an arms embargo against China that prohibits the export, re-export, or re-transfer of any defense article to China.

“For more than 10 years, this corporation and these defendants conspired to procure U.S. military products and other controlled electronic components for use in mainland China – for military radar, military satellite communications, and military guidance systems,” said U.S. Attorney Ortiz. “In doing so, these defendants violated U.S. export laws and compromised our national security. The result in this case was achieved through the exemplary investigative efforts of dedicated agents and prosecutors working with various law enforcement and other government agencies.”

The defendants also illegally exported Commerce Department-controlled electronics components to China that could be used in military applications in electronic warfare, military radar, satellite communications systems and space applications. These items could make a direct and significant contribution to weapons systems and war-fighting capabilities of U.S. adversaries, and cannot be exported to China without an export license from the U.S. Department of Commerce.

Wu founded and controlled Chitron, including its headquarters in Shenzhen, China, and its U.S. office located in Waltham, Mass. While Wu resided in China, Wei served as the manager of the U.S. office. Using Chitron, Wu targeted Chinese military factories and military research institutes as customers of Chitron, including numerous institutes of the China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, which is responsible for the procurement, development and manufacture of electronics for the Chinese military. Indeed, Wu referred to Chinese military entities as Chitron’s major customer since as early as 2002. Wu hired an engineer at Chitron’s Shenzhen office to work with Chinese military customers. By 2007, 25% of Chitron’s sales were to Chinese military entities.

Correspondence between Wu, Wei and other Chitron employees showed knowledge that U.S. export restricted parts were being shipped overseas to Chinese customers without having first obtained an export license. Wu instructed Wei and employees of Chitron-US on numerous occasions to never tell U.S. companies that parts were going overseas. At Wu and Wei’s direction, U.S. companies were told to ship all ordered products to the Chitron-US office located in Waltham, Mass.

Upon receipt by Chitron-US of the ordered products, the U.S. commodities were inspected by Chitron-US employees and consolidated into packages, which were then exported to the company’s Shenzhen office (located in Mainland China) using freight forwarders in Hong Kong, without the required export licenses from the Department of State and Department of Commerce.

“Today’s convictions represent an outstanding collaborative investigation and prosecution to bring to justice those who flout our export control laws and endanger our national security,” said John McKenna, Special Agent in Charge of the Commerce Department’s Boston Office of Export Enforcement. “Preventing dangerous U.S.-origin items from falling into the wrong hands is one of our top priorities at the Commerce Department,” he said.

“Today’s verdicts underscore the importance of ICE’s global investigative efforts aimed at disrupting and dismantling criminal organizations that profit from the illegal exportation of sensitive U.S. technology that threatens our national security,” said “Matthew J. Etre, Acting Special Agent in Charge of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office of Investigations in Boston.

“This was a significant verdict in a joint investigation with ICE, Commerce, DCIS, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office,” said Warren Bamford, Special Agent in Charge of FBI’s Boston Field Office. “The illegal export of U.S. defense technology to foreign countries is harmful to the national security of the United States. These types of violations will continue to be aggressively investigated because this conduct cannot and will not be tolerated.”

“The convictions in this case are the end result of a joint investigation conducted by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service and its partner federal law enforcement agencies,” said Resident Agent In Charge Leigh-Alistair Barzey. “This investigation demonstrates the commitment DCIS has to ensuring that sensitive military equipment and technology are not illegally exported to restricted countries, which could put America’s war fighters and the Nation at considerable risk.”

Wu and Wei both face up to 20 years in prison to be followed by three years supervised release and a $1 million fine. After serving their sentence, both will face deportation to China.

Chitron-US faces up to a $1 million fine for each count in the Indictment charging the company with illegal export of U.S. Munitions List items and $500,000 for each count in the Indictment charging them with illegal export of Commerce Department-controlled electronics. Sentencing is scheduled for August 17, 2010.

Shenzhen Chitron Electronics Company Limited, the Chinese company owned by Wu which received the U.S. electronics and delivered the parts to Chinese end-users, was also indicted for the same crimes. The court has entered a contempt order against Chitron-Shenzhen for refusing to appear for trial and fined the corporation $1.9 million dollars.

Co-defendant Bo Li, aka Eric Lee, previously pleaded guilty to making false statements on shipping documents, and faces five years in prison to be followed by three years supervised release and a $1 million fine. Sentencing is scheduled for July 22, 2010, in Boston.

The case was investigated by the Department of Commerce’s Office of Export Enforcement; Immigration and Customs Enforcement; FBI; and Defense Criminal Investigative Service. It is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys B. Stephanie Siegmann and John A. Capin of Office Anti-Terrorism and National Security Unit for the District of Massachusetts.

10-580
National Security Division

March 24, 2010

Chinese university publishes paper “Cascade-Based Attack Vulnerability on the U.S. Power Grid”

Filed under: Americas,Asia,China,Cyberspace,East Asia,North America,USA — mungurk @ 09:53

source

March 20, 2010

Academic Paper in China Sets Off Alarms in U.S.

By JOHN MARKOFF and DAVID BARBOZA

It came as a surprise this month to Wang Jianwei, a graduate engineering student in Liaoning, China, that he had been described as a potential cyberwarrior before the United States Congress.

Larry M. Wortzel, a military strategist and China specialist, told the House Foreign Affairs Committee on March 10 that it should be concerned because “Chinese researchers at the Institute of Systems Engineering of Dalian University of Technology published a paper on how to attack a small U.S. power grid sub-network in a way that would cause a cascading failure of the entire U.S.”

When reached by telephone, Mr. Wang said he and his professor had indeed published “Cascade-Based Attack Vulnerability on the U.S. Power Grid” in an international journal called Safety Science last spring. But Mr. Wang said he had simply been trying to find ways to enhance the stability of power grids by exploring potential vulnerabilities.

“We usually say ‘attack’ so you can see what would happen,” he said. “My emphasis is on how you can protect this. My goal is to find a solution to make the network safer and better protected.” And independent American scientists who read his paper said it was true: Mr. Wang’s work was a conventional technical exercise that in no way could be used to take down a power grid.

The difference between Mr. Wang’s explanation and Mr. Wortzel’s conclusion is of more than academic interest. It shows that in an atmosphere already charged with hostility between the United States and China over cybersecurity issues, including large-scale attacks on computer networks, even a misunderstanding has the potential to escalate tension and set off an overreaction.

“Already people are interpreting this as demonstrating some kind of interest that China would have in disrupting the U.S. power grid,” said Nart Villeneuve, a researcher with the SecDev Group, an Ottawa-based cybersecurity research and consulting group. “Once you start interpreting every move that a country makes as hostile, it builds paranoia into the system.”

Mr. Wortzel’s presentation at the House hearing got a particularly strong reaction from Representative Ed Royce, Republican of California, who called the flagging of the Wang paper “one thing I think jumps out to all of these Californians here today, or should.”

He was alluding to concerns that arose in 2001 when The Los Angeles Times reported that intrusions into the network that controlled the electrical grid were traced to someone in Guangdong Province, China. Later reports of other attacks often included allegations that the break-ins were orchestrated by the Chinese, although no proof has been produced.

In an interview last week about the Wang paper and his testimony, Mr. Wortzel said that the intention of these particular researchers almost did not matter.

“My point is that now that vulnerability is out there all over China for anybody to take advantage of,” he said.

But specialists in the field of network science, which explores the stability of networks like power grids and the Internet, said that was not the case.

“Neither the authors of this article, nor any other prior article, has had information on the identity of the power grid components represented as nodes of the network,” Reka Albert, a University of Pennsylvania physicist who has conducted similar studies, said in an e-mail interview. “Thus no practical scenarios of an attack on the real power grid can be derived from such work.”

The issue of Mr. Wang’s paper aside, experts in computer security say there are genuine reasons for American officials to be wary of China, and they generally tend to dismiss disclaimers by China that it has neither the expertise nor the intention to carry out the kind of attacks that bombard American government and computer systems by the thousands every week.

The trouble is that it is so easy to mask the true source of a computer network attack that any retaliation is fraught with uncertainty. This is why a war of words, like the high-pitched one going on these past months between the United States and China, holds special peril, said John Arquilla, director of the Information Operations Center at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif.

“What we know from network science is that dense communications across many different links and many different kinds of links can have effects that are highly unpredictable,” Mr. Arquilla said. Cyberwarfare is in some ways “analogous to the way people think about biological weapons — that once you set loose such a weapon it may be very hard to control where it goes,” he added.

Tension between China and the United States intensified earlier this year after Google threatened to withdraw from doing business in China, saying that it had evidence of Chinese involvement in a sophisticated Internet intrusion. A number of reports, including one last October by the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, of which Mr. Wortzel is vice chairman, have used strong language about the worsening threat of computer attacks, particularly from China.

“A large body of both circumstantial and forensic evidence strongly indicates Chinese state involvement in such activities, whether through the direct actions of state entities or through the actions of third-party groups sponsored by the state,” that report stated.

Mr. Wang’s research subject was particularly unfortunate because of the widespread perception, particularly among American military contractors and high-technology firms, that adversaries are likely to attack critical infrastructure like the United States electric grid.

Mr. Wang said in the interview that he chose the United States grid for his study basically because it was the easiest way to go. China does not publish data on power grids, he said. The United States does and had had several major blackouts; and, as he reads English, it was the only country he could find with accessible, useful data. He said that he was an “emergency events management” expert and that he was “mainly studying when a point in a network becomes ineffective.”

“I chose the electricity system because the grid can best represent how power currents flow through a network,” he said. “I just wanted to do theoretical research.”

The paper notes the vulnerability of different types of computer networks to “intentional” attacks. The authors suggest that certain types of attacks may generate a domino-style cascading collapse of an entire network. “It is expected that our findings will be helpful for real-life networks to protect the key nodes selected effectively and avoid cascading-failure-induced disasters,” the authors wrote.

Mr. Wang’s paper cites the network science research of Albert-Laszlo Barabasi, a physicist at Northeastern University. Dr. Barabasi has written widely on the potential vulnerability of networks to so-called engineered attacks.

“I am not well vested in conspiracy theories,” Dr. Barabasi said in an interview, “but this is a rather mainstream topic that is done for a wide range of networks, and, even in the area of power transmission, is not limited to the U.S. system — there are similar studies for power grids all over the world.”

March 18, 2010

Kim Jong Il Expected to visit China Later in March

Filed under: Asia,China,East Asia,North Korea — mungurk @ 10:35

source

(LEAD) N. Korean leader likely to visit China later this month: source

BEIJING, March 17 (Yonhap) — North Korean leader Kim Jong-il is likely to visit China later this month, a diplomatic source said Wednesday, a trip that could boost the prospect of resuming international talks on ending Pyongyang’s nuclear programs.

“Considering the schedules of top Chinese leaders, there is a high possibility of Chairman Kim visiting China sometime between March 25-30,” a source said on condition of anonymity, referring to Kim’s official title, chairman of the National Defense Commission.

A senior South Korean politician, who wants to visit China late this month for a meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao, is expected to put the plan off, possibly because of Kim’s trip, the source said. When the North’s leader has visited China in the past, Beijing made sure that the schedule of its top leader did not overlap with other schedules.

In particular, top Chinese Communist Party official Wang Jiarui does not have any plan to travel overseas for the rest of this month. Wang, who met with the North’s leader during a trip to Pyongyang last month, is expected to take care of protocol if Kim visits Beijing.

China’s Vice President Xi Jinping, who will begin a trip to Russia, Belarus, Finland and Sweden on Saturday, is scheduled to return home late this month, probably for a meeting with the North’s leader.

Foreign dignitaries visiting China this month include Afghanistan’s president from March 23-25, New Zealand’s foreign minister from March 23-25 and Malta’s deputy prime minister from March 23-26.

If realized, Kim’s trip is expected to raise the prospects of reopening six-nation nuclear talks. Analysts have said that such a visit could be a strong sign that the North is ready to return to the negotiating table, possibly in exchange for badly needed economic aid from the neighboring ally.

The North’s return to the talks would also lift China’s diplomatic profile as host of the negotiations.

Kim rarely travels aboard, and there have been rumors that he fears flying. Neighboring China and Russia, accessible by Kim’s luxurious armored train, have been his only foreign destinations in many years.

Kim’s previous visits to China were made in 2000, 2001, 2004 and 2006.

(END)

January 12, 2010

China tests interceptor missile

Filed under: Asia,China,East Asia,Military — mungurk @ 16:32

source
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
07:18 Mecca time, 04:18 GMT

China has successfully tested its advanced air defence capabilities, intercepting a missile in mid-flight within its territory, state media reported.

“The test has achieved the expected objective,” the official Xinhua news agency quoted the foreign ministry as saying on Tuesday.

The report on the “ground-based mid-course missile interception technology” comes amid tensions over US arms sales to Taiwan.

Last week the US cleared a sale of advanced Patriot air defence missiles to Taiwan despite opposition from Beijing, a move which could chill ties at a time when China and the US are also wary about trade disputes and economic strains.

Shi Yinhong, a Chinese expert on US-Sino ties from Renmin University of China, told Al Jazeera that there was “a connection” between the missile interceptor test and the US-Taiwan arms sales.

He said China’s missile tests were an “indirect reaction” to the weapons sales, noting that it was difficult for Beijing to take direct action against the US.

Damage to ties

A commentary from Xinhua on Monday warned of broader fallout from the Patriot missile deal, which a US official in Taipei said was part of a package passed by the US congress more than a year ago.

“Each time the United States has sold weapons to Taiwan, there has been huge damage to China-US relations,” said the commentary issued separately from the report on the anti-missile test.

“We must use counter-measures to make the other side pay a corresponding price and suffer corresponding punishment”

Major-General Jin Yinan,
People’s Liberation Army

“This US arms sale to Taiwan will be no exception.”

China has claimed sovereignty over self-ruled Taiwan since 1949, when communist forces won the Chinese civil war and fleeing nationalists gained control of the island.Beijing has since vowed to bring Taiwan under its rule, by force if necessary, and opposes US arms sales to the island as an intrusion into what it calls a domestic dispute.

China’s defence ministry warned over the weekend that it reserved the right to take unspecified action if the US followed through with the sale, which it called a “severe obstacle” to China-US military ties.

Senior officials in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army have urged Beijing to punish the US government and firms for arms deals with the disputed island.

“We have the power and ability to adopt counter-measures [against US arms sales to Taiwan],” Major-General Jin Yinan, a professor at China’s National Defence University, wrote in the Study Times, a China newspaper, earlier this month.

“We must use counter-measures to make the other side pay a corresponding price and suffer corresponding punishment.”

The Global Times quoted senior military strategist Yang Chengjun as saying that the test had “ushered China into a new phase in terms of missile interception technologies”.

“China needs an improved capability and more means of military defence as the country faces increasing security threats,” Yang was quoted as saying.

But China’s foreign ministry was quick to add that “the [missile interceptor] test is defensive in nature and is not targeted at any country”.

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
Older Posts »
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Powered by WordPress