Signal, No Noise

September 2, 2010

Catholic Church defends male-only priesthood

Filed under: Britain,Christianity,Europe,Northern Europe,Religion — mungurk @ 06:19

source

Catholic Church defends male-only priesthood

Barring women from being Catholic priests is not the result of sexism 2,000 years ago, it’s because women cannot fulfill a basic function of the priesthood, “standing in the place of Jesus,” a leading British Catholic thinker argued Monday.

“This teaching is not at all a judgment on women’s abilities or rights. It says something about the specific role of the priest in Catholic understanding – which is to represent Jesus, to stand in his place,” argued Father Stephen Wang in a statement sent out by the Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales.

It’s rare for the Catholic Church to defend its fundamental positions in this way.

Wang was responding to the announcement that campaigners for female priests will plaster posters on London buses next month during the pope’s visit to London.

The ads read “Pope Benedict – Ordain Women Now!” and will be on 15 double-decker buses running in some of London’s main tourist areas, including Parliament and Oxford Street, said Pat Brown, a spokeswoman for Catholic Women’s Ordination (CWO).

The group spent “in excess of 10,000 pounds” ($15,500) on the ads and is hoping donations will help make up at least part of that cost, Brown told CNN Friday.

Wang rejected both the tone and the content of the ads, saying that while an atheist ad campaign last year was “hesitant and ended with gentle exhortations,” this one ends “with a shout.”

And it’s based on a fundamental misunderstanding, said Wang, the dean of studies at London’s main seminary for Catholic priests, Allen Hall.

Pope John Paul II declared in 1994 that the church has no authority to ordain women, a position confirmed a year later by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who is now Pope Benedict XVI. At the time, Ratzinger was the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the arbiter of Catholic Church dogma.

Wang called the late pope’s position “surprising,” saying John Paul had meant he did not have the power to change “something that has been such a fundamental part of Christian identity from the beginning.”

The bottom line is that Jesus chose 12 men – and no women – to be his apostles, Wang argues.

The choice was “deliberate and significant, not just for that first period of history, but for every age,” Wang says.

Men and women are equal in Christianity, he continues, but “this does not mean that our sexual identity as men and women is interchangeable. Gender is not just an accident.”

He compared the role of a priest to that of an actor playing King Arthur or British soccer star Wayne Rooney in a movie.

“No one would be surprised if I said I wanted a male actor to play the lead,” he said, admitting the analogy was “weak.”

But, he said, “it shouldn’t surprise us if we expect a man to stand ‘in the person of Christ’ as a priest, to represent Jesus in his humanity – a humanity that is not sexually neutral.”

The Catholic women’s group says that in addition to its bus campaign, it plans to hold a vigil September 15, the day before the pope’s visit, outside Westminster Cathedral.

The group also plans to demonstrate at Lambeth Palace, the official London residence of the Archbishop of Canterbury – the head of the Church of England – during his meeting with the pope.

And members plan to hold a banner along the route of the popemobile, the secure vehicle which carries the pope, in London.

Pope Benedict plans to visit England and Scotland September 16-19. It will be the first state visit to the United Kingdom by a pope, according to the British Foreign Office. John Paul’s trip in 1982 was officially a pastoral visit.

CNN’s Richard Allen Greene and Melissa Gray contributed to this report.

August 24, 2010

Catholic Church, U.K. govt in bomb cover-up: Report

Filed under: Britain,Christianity,Europe,Northern Europe,Religion,Terrorism — mungurk @ 16:55

source

Catholic Church, U.K. govt in bomb cover-up: Report

CLAUDY, Northern Ireland – The U.K. government, the police and the Catholic Church colluded to protect a priest suspected of involvement in a 1972 bombing in Northern Ireland that killed 9 people, a report said on Tuesday.
The Police Ombudsman’s eight-year probe revealed a cardinal was involved in moving Father James Chesney out of British-ruled Northern Ireland, highlighting anew the way the Church hierarchy shielded priests from allegations of criminal activity.
The inquiry showed former Secretary of State for Northern Ireland William Whitelaw had a private meeting with Cardinal William Conway, the head of the Catholic Church in Ireland, in which they discussed the possibility of transferring Chesney.
“I accept that 1972 was one of the worst years of the ‘Troubles’ and that the arrest of a priest might well have aggravated the security situation,” Police Ombudsman Al Hutchinson said. But “the decision failed those who were murdered, injured and bereaved in the bombing.”
No one was ever charged or convicted for the triple car bomb attack on the rural village of Claudy. Those killed included a 9-year-old girl and two teenage boys.
Chesney, a priest in a neighbouring parish, always denied any involvement, though the police had intelligence that he was the South Derry leader of republican guerrilla group, the IRA, and a sniffer dog found traces of explosive in his car when he was stopped at a checkpoint in September 1972. He died in 1980.
The current head of the Catholic Church in Ireland, who has been under pressure to resign over his role in concealing sex abuse cases, denied the Church took part in a cover-up.
“He (Cardinal Conway) was faced with an impossible situation but his primary consideration would be the prevention of any further acts of violence,” said Cardinal Sean Brady.
One of the relatives of those killed told reporters that she had been told the priest had continued his IRA activities after being transferred to Donegal in the Irish Republic in 1973.
“This is an absolute disgrace. It is an absolute outrage,” said Tracey Deans, whose grandfather was killed. “I would like to know how many more people suffered because of him.”
“A VERY BAD MAN”
July 1972 was the bloodiest month in the bloodiest year of three decades of conflict in Northern Ireland and the Claudy bombings came six months after British soldiers shot dead 13 unarmed civilians in a civil rights march in Londonderry.
A photograph of a Catholic priest waving a blood-stained handkerchief in front of a fatally wounded marcher being carried through the city was the defining image of “Bloody Sunday.”
The police may have feared that arresting a priest over the Claudy attack could have triggered a fierce backlash among Northern Ireland’s minority Catholic population.
The British government made an historic apology two months ago for “Bloody Sunday” and the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Owen Paterson, said on Tuesday he was “profoundly sorry” that the victims of Claudy had been denied justice.
Calls for a South African-style truth commission into the decades-long conflict is unlikely given the still shaky concord between groups that want to keep Northern Ireland part of Britain and those that want a united Ireland.
A senior police officer wrote in Nov. 1972 that, rather than arrest Chesney, “our masters may find it possible to bring the subject into any conversations they may be having with the Cardinal or Bishops at some future date . . . “
Conway’s protection of Chesney echoed action by the Catholic Church to shield priests from allegations of child sex abuse.
Scandals over the abuse and the cover-ups have helped topple the Church from its once dominant position in Irish life.
The key police officers in the Claudy bombing are now dead but the ombudsman said that had they been alive their actions would have been investigated.

© Copyright (c) Reuters

August 17, 2010

Australia’s Gillard backs republic after Queen’s death

Filed under: Australia,Britain,Europe,Northern Europe,Oceania — mungurk @ 08:41

source

Australia’s Gillard backs republic after Queen’s death

17 August 2010 Last updated at 03:10 ET

Australia should become a republic when Queen Elizabeth II dies, Prime Minister Julia Gillard has said just days ahead of a general election.

Welsh-born Ms Gillard said the Queen’s death would be an “appropriate point” for Australia to move away from having a British monarch as head of state.

Australians voted against becoming a republic in a 1999 referendum, but the issue continues to be divisive.

Ms Gillard’s main opponent, Tony Abbott, is a staunch monarchist.

Up until now the question of an Australian republic has hardly featured in this election campaign.

The BBC’s Nick Bryant in Sydney says even in this strongly patriotic country it is not considered an urgent national priority and Julia Gillard has indicated it won’t become one for her Labor government while the Queen is on the throne.

Ms Gillard is a republican herself but says there is deep affection for the 84-year-old monarch whom she wished a long and healthy life.

Ms Gillard said that the appropriate time for Australia to move towards a republic was when there was a change in monarch, even if that didn’t happen for another decade or more.

May 24, 2010

Will Britain Ban Hizb-ut Tahrir?

Filed under: Britain,Counterterrorism,Europe,Northern Europe,Terrorism — mungurk @ 00:12

source

The Queen’s Speech: Bill by Bill

The Queen’s Speech will contain pledges to introduce 21 bills and other legislation during the next parliamentary year. Here is what is planned:

By Patrick Hennessy, Political Editor
Published: 8:30PM BST 22 May 2010

The Queen reads out the Queen's Speech

The Queen’s Speech will contain pledges to introduce 21 bills and other legislation during the next parliamentary year Photo: PA

BILLS FOR IMMEDIATE INTRODUCTION

Academies Bill (Dept for Education)

This is being promoted as a flagship piece of legislation which will enshrine the new coalition government’s commitment to education. It will allow more schools to become academies with freedom from day-to-day Whitehall control, as well as giving more say to teachers to decide what should be in the curriculum.

Ministers believe that “setting rules in Whitehall” is not the way to raise standards in classrooms.

CON POLICY

Local Government (Revocation of Structural Change) Bill. (Dept for Communities and Local Govt).

This will stop the planned creation of single-tier councils serving Exeter and Norwich. Eric Pickles, the Communities Secretary, brands the restructuring plans “wasteful and unnecessary” and claims scrapping them will save £40 million.

It is also likely to stop dozens of Tory and Lib Dem councillors losing their current posts.

CON LIB POLICY

Identity Documents Bill (Home Office).

The imminent scrapping of identity cards and the planned National Identity Register is already being foreshadowed on the Home Office website. This Bill will enact a policy that both coalition partners put forward but the fact it is one of the first three pieces of legislation to be unveiled is a boost for Nick Clegg and the Lib Dems’ civil liberties agenda.

LIB CON POLICY

BILLS TO BE INTRODUCED BEFORE SUMMER RECESS

Office of Budget Responsibility (and National Audit Office Governance) Bill. (Treasury)

This sets up one of the key bodies promoted by George Osborne – the independent OBR which will replace the Treasury as the official “forecaster” for growth and borrowing ahead of the emergency Budget next month.

It is likely also to reform the way the National Audit Office, the state spending watchdog, is run.

CON

The Great Repeals Bill aka The Freedom Bill (Cabinet Office).

This will enact a raft of reforms described by Nick Clegg last week as the most radical redistribution of power from the state to the people in 200 years. It will include the scrapping of universal DNA databases and the placing of restrictions on internet records while the use of CCTV cameras will be reviewed, the ContactPoint children’s database will be shut down. Libel laws will be reviewed while limits on peaceful protest will be removed.

LIB

Equitable Life Payments Scheme Bill. (Treasury)

This is set to offer compensation without means-testing for up to a million savers who lost out when the insurance company Equitable Life came close to collapse a decade ago.

Payouts, which could include families of 30,000 investors who have died since the company got into trouble, could run into hundreds of millions of pounds.

However, this Bill would enact a key Tory pre-election promise.

CON

Terrorist Asset Freezing Bill. (Treasury)

There is already provision for freezing terrorists’ assets in law – however, a new Bill could be the vehicle for expanding the definition of an organisation classed as terrorist, possibly to include Hizb-ut-Tahir, the revolutionary Islamist party, which David Cameron has said he will ban.

CON

National Insurance Contributions Bill. (Treasury)

This is set to be the vehicle for stopping in its tracks Labour’s planned rise in National Insurance Contributions for employers, which was to come into force next year and was dubbed a “jobs tax” by the Tories. However after consultations with the Lib Dems, the rise in NICs for employees will still go ahead.

CON LIB

Parliamentary Reform Bill. (Ministry of Justice).

Ken Clarke will oversee one of the big prizes for the Lib Dems of their coalition deal – a huge political reform package which is likely to include five-year fixed-term parliaments (including the controversial “55 per cent” rule for dissolving parliament), reducing the number of MPs, giving voters the right to recall their MP and possibly reform of the House of Lords to make it wholly or mainly elected.

Its biggest trophy for the Lib Dems would be a paving of the way for a referendum on shifting from first-past-the post to the multi-choice Additional Vote system for general elections.

LIB

BILLS TO BE INTRODUCED AFTER SUMMER RECESS

Decentralisation and Localism Bill. (Department for Communities and Local Government).

Eric Pickles, the Communities secretary, will take charge of the drive to devolve greater powers to councils and local communities.

Communities are to be given much more control over housing and planning decisions. Local government finance is to be “reviewed”.

CON LIB

Welfare Reform Bill (DWP).

The key piece of legislation for Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary. This will be “sold” as helping people back into work, partly by scrapping all existing programmes and establishing a single welfare-to-work regime.

However it will also increase sanctions on those who refuse, including reassessing all Incapacity Benefit claimants for “readiness to work” – with the threat of being moved on to Jobseeker’s Allowance.

CON

Pensions and Savings Bill (DWP).

This is likely to restore the earnings link for the basic state pension – with a guarantee that pensions are raised by at least 2.5 per cent a year. It could also set out a timetable for the review into the date at which the state pension age starts to rise.

LIB

Financial Services Regulation Bill. (Treasury)

Likely to enact various reforms planned by George Osborne, the Chancellor, including putting regulation back in the hands of the Bank of England – a key change from the Labour years. It could also be the vehicle for introducing a banking levy and “cracking down” on what ministers describe as “unacceptable” bonuses.

Significantly, though, Mr Osborne’s Treasury is in the lead here, rather than Vince Cable’s business department.

CON

Energy Security and Green Economy Bill. (Dept for Energy and Climate Change)

A big win for the Liberal Democrats and Chris Huhne, the Energy Secretary, this will seek to improve energy efficiency in homes and businesses and promote low carbon energy production. Energy supplies will also be “secured”.

LIB

Public Bodies Bill. (Cabinet Office)

An assault on quangos is likely to be a key feature of efforts by the new government to find billions of pounds of “efficiency savings” across Whitehall. The drive was promised by the Conservatives in opposition but, significantly, has been handed to Nick Clegg and his team at the Cabinet Office.

LIB CON

Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill (Home Office).

The vehicle for making police forces more accountable – including oversight by what ministers refer to as a directly elected “individual”. Police must also publish monthly local crime data statistics. This is also likely to include a fresh crackdown on anti-social behaviour and alcohol-related violence.

CON

European Communities (Amendment) Referendum Lock Bill (Foreign Office).

The key Bill for William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, which will enshrine the commitment to hold a referendum if there are any more attempts by the EU to grab significant powers from Britain under the Lisbon Treaty or in any other way.

This is a significant move to reassure Tory activists.

CON

Scotland Bill (Scotland Office)

This will implement the recommendations from the final report of the Calman Commission on Scottish Devolution. These include giving the Scottish Parliament greater powers on raising taxes – as well as new borrowing powers. Some other responsibilities – including over drink-drive limits and speed limits – are also to be devolved.

LIB

Education and Children’s Bill (Dept for Education)

The second big bill for Michael Gove, the Children’s Secretary, this could be the vehicle for his much-anticipated “free schools” drive to allow different groups, including parents, to start and run state schools.

It could also include the Lib Dem-backed “pupil premium” which would see more money being spent on children from a disadvantaged background, as well as focusing on early-years learning.

BLUE YELLOW

Armed Forces Bill (Ministry of Defence).

The big vehicle for Liam Fox, the Defence Secretary. It is not clear what laws will be affected – but the coalition has already promised to rebuild the Military Covenant, including maximising leave periods, helping the children of service personnel, boosting recruitment into professions and providing extra mental health services for veterans.

CON

Health Bill. (Dept of Health)

The main Bill for Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary. The new government’s main aims are to strengthen the voice of patients and the role of doctors in NHS decision-making, while improving public health. There will also be a big drive to reduce health “inequalities”.

CON LIB

OTHER LEGISLATION

Overseas development aid – a parliamentary motion (Dept for International Development).

The government will commit via a parliamentary motion to spend 0.7 per cent of national income on development aid by 2013. Such a motion, however, is not legally binding – and ministers have already promised to “enshrine this commitment in law.”

Airport Economic Regulation Bill (Department for Transport).

Described as reform to benefit passengers – could be the full-scale break-up of BAA’s monopoly on airport ownership.

Cap on non-EU economic migrants – secondary legislation. (Home Office).

There is likely to be controversy if parliament is not given the chance of a full debate on plans to set an annual “cap” on immigrants from outside the EU and this is simply done by ministerial decree.

“Economic migrants” suggests no curb on student numbers – or spouses.

Draft Bill on Reform of Parliamentary Privilege. (Ministry of Justice).

Likely to block MPs from using privilege as a defence for wrongdoing, for example over expenses.

Broadband Infrastructure – secondary legislation. (Business Innovation and Skills Dept).

This will support investment in new high-speed broadband internet connections.

High speed railway network (Dept for Transport).

A simple Bill to enable the network’s construction. A route between London and Birmingham has already been announced – with plans to expand it to the north of England.

April 7, 2010

Islamic Televangelists Draw Acolytes, Critics

source

July 22, 2005

Religion and television have been a powerful combination in this country, and the same thing is true in the Middle East. Arab channel surfers looking for a dose of Islamic preaching needn’t look far.

Amr Khalid, a 38-year-old former accountant from Egypt, is one of a handful of Islamic televangelists winning converts among young, upper-middle class Arabs. He and others use many of the same techniques used by Christian televangelists in the West.

Threatened by Khalid’s popularity, the Egyptian government banned him from preaching in his own country. He now lives in England, but his satellite TV shows and Internet site are more popular than ever.

March 24, 2010

Warning for man accused over airport breast X-ray

source

Warning for man accused over airport breast X-ray

(AFP) – 7 hours ago

LONDON — Police said Wednesday they have warned an airport worker who reportedly made a crude remark about a colleague’s breasts as a newly-installed security scanner took a full body X-ray of her.

Jo Margetson, 29, walked into an X-ray machine at London’s Heathrow Airport by mistake before the incident allegedly took place — and told The Sun newspaper she is now “totally traumatised”.

The reported incident, the first such complaint since the machines were introduced earlier this year, has highlighted privacy concerns about the use of full body scanners at British airports.

Heathrow and Manchester airports has been using them since an alleged bid to blow up a US-bound jet on Christmas Day was foiled, while the US and The Netherlands are among other countries where they are being installed.

When asked about the story, a spokesman for London’s Metropolitan Police said: “Police received an allegation regarding an incident that happened at Heathrow Terminal 5 on March 10.

“A first instance harassment warning has been issued to a 25-year-old male.”

Airports operator BAA, which runs Heathrow, added that it was investigating the allegations.

“If these claims are found to be substantiated, we will take appropriate action,” a spokesman added.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has warned the government that the scanners could run counter to the right to privacy enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights.

“When privacy-invading machines like these are installed at our airports, abuses like this are inevitable,” said Alex Deane of campaign group Big Brother Watch.

London School of Economics: ‘Twin terror threat’ to London Olympics 2012

source

‘Twin Terror Threat’ To London Olympics 2012

1:35pm UK, Tuesday March 23, 2010

Lia Hervey, Olympics producer

Terrorists could use a “blended attack” to simultaneously hit physical targets and cyber systems during the London Olympic Games, a security expert has warned.

Cyber security expert professor Peter Sommer of the London School of Economics warned that computer security would be extremely important during the Games.

“There is what’s called a ‘blended attack’, so there is a physical attack but it’s made easier because someone is disrupting cyber systems at the same time, so that is the sort of scenario that people have got to worry about,” he said.

Cyber security attacks are just one of the issues the man in charge of Olympic Security, assistant commissioner Chris Allison of the Metropolitan Police will be looking at and investigating.

AC Allison is in charge of a £600m budget to tackle a vast range of traditional threats to the safety of the Olympic Games.

Our biggest threat is without doubt terrorism and (our job) is to make the venues secure so people can go there and have a good time

Assistant commissioner Chris Allison

His brief includes all the ordinary security concerns, such as terrorism and petty crime, but also the danger of online ticket scams, potential protesters hijacking Olympic websites and also the more sinister criminals.

Right now, Britain is thought to be fending off daily cyber attacks from foreign states and terrorists and police and experts believe London 2012 will be especially vulnerable.

AC Allison has just returned from the Vancouver Winter Olympic Games, where he was embedded with Canadian Police to share intelligence and knowledge.

He hopes his experiences will help him control one of the biggest policing operations the country has ever seen. There will be between 8,000 and 9,000 officers on the streets of London on the busiest days. They will also need 6,500 special officers, up from the current 2,000.

AC Allison says that despite the huge challenges, his aim is to make sure they find the criminals now and ensure the Games go ahead as planned.

He said: “In Vancouver the opening ceremony was going to start dead on six-o-clock that particular evening and it started dead on six-o-clock. Our planning is all on the basis that this isn’t an event you can delay for a few hours.

“I think our biggest threat at the moment is without doubt the threat of terrorism and (our job) is to make the venues secure so people can go there and have a good time.”

March 18, 2010

GPS Jammers Used by Car Thieves, Could Be Used By Terrorists To Bring Down Aircraft

Filed under: Britain,Europe,Northern Europe,Terrorism — mungurk @ 11:01

source

Updated March 17, 2010

By John Brandon

- FOXNews.com

An electronic device small enough to fit in a shirt pocket and big enough to conceivably bring down an airplane can be easily purchased over the Internet. All a terrorist needs is a credit card and $49

Despite being illegal and potentially dangerous, GPS jammers like this model (designed to fit a car cigarette lighter) are cheap and readily available online.

With car thieves in the United Kingdom using GPS jammers to aid their getaways, experts say it’s only a matter of time until crooks — and, ominously, terrorists — in the United States catch on.

Jammers transmit a low-power signal that creates signal noise and fools a GPS receiver into thinking the satellites are not available. They can be used to confuse police and avoid toll charges, and some pranksters use them to nettle unsuspecting iPhone users.

But the real threat is the unknown. Criminals could use them to hide their whereabouts from law enforcement — and some experts fear terrorists could use high-powered jammers to disrupt GPS reception on an airplane or in military operations.

The devices pose serious societal risks, and they’re unquestionably illegal to buy and use in the United States. The FCC is bullish about pursuing anyone who buys a GPS jammer and will prosecute and jail anyone who uses one. Yet they’re easily bought online, and their proponents say they should stay that way. Fox News was able to buy GPS jammers for as little as $50 from numerous online sources.

“GPS is so embedded in the transportation, manufacturing industries and economies of our societies that the risk is high,” said David Last, an Emeritus Professor of Bangor University in the U.K. and a well-known authority on criminal use of GPS jammers.

“It’s especially so in telecommunications: GPS is the ultimate source of timing for most of our telephone systems, the Internet and, in the U.S., phone cells.”

All those systems are potential prey for jammers, and that’s largely why they are illegal. But the devices’ proponents say they can serve a purpose, and that people should have the right to buy them. And, for the time being, they can.

Jammer-Store.com, a company based in Sweden, sells the GJ6 jammer for $430. Brando Workshop, based on Hong Kong, sells the Car Cigarette Anti-GPS System for $49. Jammer-Store.com touts free worldwide shipping via UPS, FedEx and others as a perk for shoppers; one site even cited U.S.-specific models.

Michael Kharkovoy, the CEO at Jammer-Store, told FoxNews.com that GPS jammers can be stowed easily in a car or a bag and can help avoid spy detection — say, from a spouse who suspects infidelity and plants a GPS tracking device like the Zoombak in a car.

“GPS jammer will help you protect your personal privacy,” said Kharkovoy. “Our new GPS jammer model GJ6 was created to block all possible tracking systems and also all civil GPS systems including GPS L1, GPS L2, and GPS L5. To run the GPS jammer you simply turn on the switch at the top of the jammer.”

But that, says Bruce Romano, the legal adviser at the FCC’s Office of Engineering and Technology, is not a good argument for using a jammer. Anyone, he says, can hire a detective to perform a sweep of a car or personal belongings to look for GPS receivers.

“Besides being illegal, or [criminals] thinking they can get away with using them because customs will not detect them, there are a wide variety of critical devices that could be affected, and there could be unintended consequences that cause problems, and you have no idea you are causing them,” Romano said.

The Air Force — tasked with deploying and maintaining GPS satellites — acknowledges that GPS systems are vulnerable, since they are widely available for public use.

“GPS design has incorporated measures to ensure signal availability to users in a war fighter environment,” said Andy Roake, chief of current operations at Air Force Space Command Public Affairs. “An element of signal availability is jam resistance, and that has been a key focus in the development of the satellite constellation, the ground segment, and military user equipment.

“It is an important part of what we’ve done with our GPS constellation, and we continually work to improve jam-resistant capability. However, we cannot discuss technical elements of how we achieve this due to the sensitivity of revealing capabilities to any potential adversary.”

While government agencies will not discuss how they detect or dissuade jamming equipment, or how next-gen GPS satellites will be improved to make jamming more difficult, Last said there was one step the Bush Administration took in 2008 to counteract the jamming risk — a high-power, ground-based system called Enhanced Loran (eLoran), which was designed to be a fall-back for GPS jamming.

“So far, the current administration has not announced any intention to proceed with eLoran,” Last said, “… leaving the U.S. without the principal defense it had announced it wished to deploy.”

Of course, GPS and cell phone jammers are not exactly state of the art. The devices, which cause signal confusion and disruption, are actually similar to illegal cell phone jammers.

The risk is low for airplanes, which use ground-based radars for guidance and have a back-up navigation system that does not depend on satellites. Military personnel use a private GPS network. But GPS jamming could nonetheless cause confusion in the cockpit as pilots have to switch to back up navigation systems. And maritime shipments that rely on GPS coordinates for finding port locations could face problems as well.

Ronald Repasi, the FCC’s Deputy Chief for the Office of Engineering and Technology, said selling, importing, owning, or using a GPS jammer in the U.S. is illegal, and he said the agency actively pursues those who use the devices. He said GPS jammers could pose a potential risk if used negligently.

“It goes to the capability of the jamming device,” said Repasi.  ”Higher power devices will have greater range and greater potential for interference over a wider area than lower power devices.”

March 16, 2010

Counterintelligence traps MI6 man ‘trying to sell secrets’

source

A former MI6 spy has been accused of trying to sell “top secret” intelligence files to a foreign government for £2m.

By Duncan Gardham, Security Correspondent
Published: 5:12PM GMT 03 Mar 2010

Daniel Houghton, 25, was caught in a sting operation after allegedly approaching a foreign intelligence agency offering to sell them information he had collected while working for the Secret Intelligence Service, known as MI6.

The files, which belonged to the domestic security service MI5, allegedly related to the capabilities of the security and intelligence services and the techniques they have developed to gather intelligence, sources said, and were labeled “top secret” and “secret.”

Houghton, who worked for MI6 between September 2007 and May 2009, allegedly telephoned the foreign intelligence service three months after leaving MI6 to try and arrange a deal.

But undercover MI5 officers, known as “spy catchers”, met him in February to view the material on his laptop and allegedly negotiated a price of £900,000, while recording the meeting with hidden listening devices.

Houghton allegedly told them he had downloaded the information onto a number of CDs and DVD disks which he then copied onto a secure digital memory card of the type used in cameras.

He also allegedly told the undercover MI5 officers that he had copied material onto a second memory card which he had hidden at his mother’s home in Devon.

They arranged to meet him again at a central London hotel where he allegedly showed them the material on a laptop and then handed over two memory cards and a computer hard drive.

Sources said he was allowed to leave the hotel room with £900,000 in a suitcase before he was arrested as he waited for a hotel lift by plain clothes officers from the Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command.

It is understood Houghton told them: “You’ve got the wrong man.”

Police have conducted a series of raids since the arrest on Monday at Houghton’s shared flat in Hoxton, east London and at his mother’s home, a farm house in Holne, near Newton Abbot in Devon.

They are understood to be looking for any copies of the material he may have downloaded and any other material he may have stolen.

Sources said they had found additional hard copies of material marked “top secret,” “secret” and “restricted.”

Houghton, who is single and has dual British and Dutch citizenship, is understood to have been born abroad before his mother moved back to Britain.

He was brought up in the Netherlands and Devon, went to university in Birmingham where he studied computing. He has an older brother aged 28, and two sisters aged 26, and 23.

His flatmate, Kimberly Peterson, 27, a student from the US, said he had told her he was working for Lloyds Bank as a graduate trainee and she had no idea he used to work for MI6.

She said: “My family back home in Seattle are terrified. They wanted me to jump straight on the first flight home.

“We got on but we weren’t close. He was quiet but friendly. There was nothing that would have raised any suspicion.

“It feels like I am in my own episode of Law and Order.”

On Wednesday he appeared at Westminster Magistrates Court wearing a white long-sleeved T-shirt and jeans.

He was accused under the Theft Act of stealing a number of electronic files belonging to MI5 containing “techniques for intelligence collection” between September 1 2007, and May 31 2009.

Houghton was also alleged to have “disclosed articles relating to security or intelligence, namely a number of electronic files containing techniques for intelligence collection,” contrary to the Official Secrets Act 1989 on March 1 this year.

Houghton did not apply for bail and District Judge Timothy Workman remanded him in custody until a further hearing next week.

January 18, 2010

Airport body scanners ‘unlikely’ to foil al-Qaeda

Filed under: Britain,Counterterrorism,Europe,Northern Europe,Terrorism — mungurk @ 22:12

source
Page last updated at 16:00 GMT, Monday, 4 January 2010

Airport body scanners would be “unlikely” to detect many of the explosive devices used by terrorist groups, a Tory MP has warned.

Ben Wallace, who used to work at defence firm QinetiQ, one of the companies making the technology, warned it was not a “big silver bullet”.

A computer screen showing the results of a full body scan

Electromagnetic waves are beamed onto passengers to create a 3-D image

Gordon Brown has said the scanners are to be introduced at UK airports.

A woman standing in a body scanner

People stand fully clothed in a scanner while their image is examined

A spokeswoman for QinetiQ said the technology “should be part of a layered approach to security”.

Mr Wallace said the scanners would probably not have detected the failed Detroit plane plot of Christmas Day.

He said the same of the 2006 airliner liquid bomb plot and of explosives used in the 2005 bombings of three Tube trains and a bus in London.

BAA, which runs six UK airports, said it is to install the machines “as soon as is practical” at Heathrow.

Mr Wallace – an ex Army officer – was employed by QinetiQ as their overseas director in the security and intelligence division before being elected to the Lancaster and Wyre seat in 2005.

He said the “passive millimetre wave scanners” – which QinetiQ helped develop – probably would not have detected key plots affecting passengers in the UK in recent years.

QinetiQ is one of a number of companies that manufacture this kind of security scanning equipment.

‘Layered’ approach

Mr Wallace told BBC Radio 4′s Today programme: “The advantage of the millimetre waves are that they can be used at longer range, they can be quicker and they are harmless to travellers.

“But there is a big but, and the but was in all the testing that we undertook, it was unlikely that it would have picked up the current explosive devices being used by al-Qaeda.”

He added: “It probably wouldn’t have picked up the very large plot with the liquids in 2006 at Heathrow or indeed the… bombs that were used on the Tube because it wasn’t very good and it wasn’t that easy to detect liquids and plastics unless they were very solid plastics.

“This is not necessarily the big silver bullet that is somehow being portrayed by Downing Street.”

A spokeswoman for QinetiQ said “no single technology can address every eventuality or security risk”.

“QinetiQ’s passive millimetre wave system, SPO, is a… people-screening system which can identify potential security threats concealed on the human body. It is not a checkpoint security system.

“SPO can effectively shortlist people who may need further investigation, either via other technology such as x-rays, or human intervention such as a pat-down search.”

Staff screening

Simon Davies, director of the human rights watchdog Privacy International, also expressed doubts that the scanners would make air travel more secure.

“These machines can’t tell you what the object is underneath or within the clothing,” he said.

“They can only detect the irregularity. The problem is the way modern clothing is designed, the fact that people take many objects of a non-metallic nature through airports means that the machines are of extremely limited value.”

He said emphasis was needed to continue with “ordinary and quite boring measures that actually do work” such as screening airport staff and conducting vehicle checks.

Aviation security analyst Chris Yates said better training of staff was needed alongside the introduction of new technology.

“I’ve seen some very awful examples of the pat down,” he said.

“If it’s done effectively, yes, you can do a proper examination of somebody and pretty much determine whether they are hiding something.

“But at the end of the shift, on a bad day at work, the security guards just wanting to get home, is he going to want to do that? That’s the big issue and I would prefer to see technology doing the electronic pat down, than a person doing it.”

Norman Shanks, former head of security for BAA, said body scanners can only be part of the solution and that passenger profiles are also vital.

“Profiling takes into account their behaviour patterns, their tickets, how they purchase them, how they’re acting and interacting with people and many times it’s believed this is a security person’s function.”

‘Pat down’

The US is also introducing tougher checks for air passengers from nations deemed to have links with terrorism.

BBC transport correspondent Tom Symonds said that, according to the Department for Transport, the new security measures introduced at UK airports on Monday were not causing serious disruption.

British Airways said it had no delays and the checks were largely being carried out at departure airports around the world in countries on a list published by the US Transportation Security Administration, our correspondent added.

These include Nigeria, Pakistan, Syria, Iran, Sudan and Yemen.

Mr Brown had said travellers to and from British airports would see the “gradual” introduction of the use of full body scanners and hand luggage checks for traces of explosives.

They will initially operate alongside metal detectors, and be used for all flights in and out of the country.

Scanner technology

On Sunday, Mr Brown accepted there was no way to be certain that the devices would be 100% effective, and “we have got to go further”.

The £80,000 full body scanners produce “naked” images of passengers.

They work by beaming electromagnetic waves on to passengers while they stand in a booth. A virtual three-dimensional image is then created from the reflected energy.

The machines are currently being trialled at Manchester airport following tests at Heathrow airport from 2004 to 2008.

They are also being rolled out across the US, with 40 machines used at 19 airports.

The latest decisions came after Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, now in custody, was accused of trying to detonate a bomb on a plane bound for the US on 25 December.

Older Posts »
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Powered by WordPress