Signal, No Noise

September 1, 2010

Obama Says Iraq Combat Mission Is Over

Filed under: Americas,Iraq,Middle East,Military,North America,USA — mungurk @ 10:31

source
By HELENE COOPER and SHERYL GAY STOLBERG
Published: August 31, 2010
(Doug Mills/The New York Times)  President Obama addressed the nation from the Oval Office about the end of combat in Iraq on Tuesday night.

WASHINGTON — President Obama declared an end on Tuesday to the seven-year American combat mission in Iraq, saying that the United States has met its responsibility to that country and that it is now time to turn to pressing problems at home.

In a prime-time address from the Oval Office, Mr. Obama balanced praise for the troops who fought and died in Iraq with his conviction that getting into the conflict had been a mistake in the first place. But he also used the moment to emphasize that he sees his primary job as addressing the weak economy and other domestic issues — and to make clear that he intends to begin disengaging from the war in Afghanistan next summer.

“We have sent our young men and women to make enormous sacrifices in Iraq, and spent vast resources abroad at a time of tight budgets at home,” Mr. Obama said. “Through this remarkable chapter in the history of the United States and Iraq, we have met our responsibility. Now, it’s time to turn the page.”

Seeking to temper partisan feelings over the war on a day when Republicans pointed out that Mr. Obama had opposed the troop surge generally credited with helping to bring Iraq a measure of stability, the president offered some praise for his predecessor, George W. Bush. Mr. Obama acknowledged their disagreement over Iraq but said that no one could doubt Mr. Bush’s “support for our troops, or his love of country and commitment to our security.”

Mr. Obama spoke for about 18 minutes, saying that violence would continue in Iraq and that the United States would continue to play a key role in nurturing a stable democracy there. He celebrated America’s fighting forces as “the steel in our ship of state,” and pledged not to waver in the fight against Al Qaeda.

But he suggested that he sees his role in addressing domestic issues as dominant, saying that it would be difficult to get the economy rolling again but that doing so was “our central mission as a people, and my central responsibility as president.”

With his party facing the prospect of losing control of Congress in this fall’s elections and his own poll numbers depressed in large part because of the lackluster economy and still-high unemployment, he said the nation’s perseverance in Iraq must be matched by determination to address problems at home.

Over the last decade, “we have spent over a trillion dollars at war, often financed by borrowing from overseas,” he said. “And so at this moment, as we wind down the war in Iraq, we must tackle those challenges at home with as much energy and grit and sense of common purpose as our men and women in uniform who have served abroad.”

Mr. Obama acknowledged a war fatigue among Americans who have called into question his focus on the Afghanistan war, now approaching its 10th year. He said that American forces in Afghanistan “will be in place for a limited time” to give Afghans the chance to build their government and armed forces.

“But, as was the case in Iraq, we cannot do for Afghans what they must ultimately do for themselves,” the president said. He reiterated that next July he would begin transferring responsibility for security to Afghans, at a pace to be determined by conditions.

“But make no mistake: this transition will begin, because open-ended war serves neither our interests nor the Afghan people’s,” he said.

This was no iconic end-of-war moment with photos of soldiers kissing nurses in Times Square or victory parades down America’s Main Streets.

Instead, in the days leading to the Tuesday night deadline for the withdrawal of American combat troops, it has appeared as if administration officials and the American military were the only ones marking the end of this country’s combat foray into Iraq. Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., and Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are all in Baghdad for the official ceremony on Wednesday.

The very sight of Mr. Obama addressing Americans from the Oval Office — from the same desk where Mr. Bush announced the beginning of the conflict — shows the distance traveled since the Iraq war began. On the night of March 20, 2003, when the Army’s Third Infantry Division first rolled over the border from Kuwait into Iraq, Mr. Obama was a state senator in Illinois.

Mr. Bush was at the height of his popularity, and the perception at home and in many places abroad was that America could achieve its national security goals primarily through military power. One of the biggest fears among the American troops in the convoy pouring into Iraq that night — every one of them suited in gas masks and wearing biohazard suits — was that the man they came to topple might unleash a chemical weapons attack.

Seven years and five months later, the biggest fears of American soldiers revolve around the primitive, basic, homemade bombs and old explosives in Afghanistan that were left over from the Soviet invasion. In Iraq, what was perceived as a threat from a powerful dictator, Saddam Hussein, has dissolved into the worry that as United States troops pull out they are leaving behind an unstable and weak government that could be influenced by Iran.

On Tuesday, a senior intelligence official said that Iran continues to supply militant groups in Iraq with weapons, training and equipment.

Saudi Arabia Crushing Political Opposition in Name of Counterterrorism

Filed under: Counterterrorism,Middle East,Saudi Arabia,Terrorism — mungurk @ 10:28

source

Riyadh reportedly crushing dissent

Published: Aug. 31, 2010 at 1:54 PM

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia, Aug. 31 (UPI) — A crackdown in Saudi Arabia on Islamic militancy is used as a pretense to arrest dissidents seeking political reform, opponents said.

Washington praised Saudi Arabia for rounding up scores of Islamic militants in the years since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

Critics, however, said the ruling monarchy is using the crackdown as an excuse to silence opposition forces in the kingdom, The Wall Street Journal reports.

Mohammad al-Qahtani, who represents detained dissident and former Judge Suliman al-Reshoudi, complained the monarchy was using the fight against terrorism as an excuse.

“Using the anti-terror campaign has been the conspicuous Saudi policy to arrest and harass political reformists and human-rights activists,” he told the Journal. “It is a serious threat to those dedicated to nonviolent change in the nation.”

Lawyers have sued the Saudi interior ministry for what they say was the arbitrary arrest of the former judge, who is still held without charge more than three years after his arrest. The U.S. State Department, meanwhile, mentioned Reshoudi’s name in its write-up on human rights in Saudi Arabia.

The interior minister threw out the case, however, and the Saudi government told the Journal it wouldn’t comment on ongoing internal matters.

August 29, 2010

Al Qaeda Plans for War with Israel

source

Al Qaeda is warning its supporters and sympathizers to prepare for a new war in the Middle East, which it says will pit Israel against Iran. Al Qaeda’s franchise in Yemen, the self-styled al Qaeda in the Arabian Pennisula (AQAP), issued an audio message this month with a lecture by its second-in-command Saeed al Shehri in which he tells jihadists in the Middle East that “what is expected is for the war to begin by the Jews against Iran.” Israel will stage air strikes on Iran’s nuclear installations to start. Shehri expects the Iranian Shia regime to try to take advantage of an Israeli attack on its nuclear facilities to seize the holy cities of Mecca and Medina by blaming Saudi Arabia for helping Israel attack. In turn, the Israelis will seize territory in the Levant to establish “the greater state of Israel.” The Sunni Arab population of the Middle East will be caught between the “Jews in the Middle East and Iran in the Peninsula.”

Shehri was held in Guantanamo for six years after being caught in Pakistan in December 2001 before being sent back home to his native Saudi Arabia and then fleeing to Yemen to help set up AQAP. He has been a creative strategist for AQAP from its start and was behind the plot to assassinate Saudi Arabia’s deputy interior minister, Muhammad bin Nayef, a year ago that failed only by inches when the suicide bomber tripped at the last minute. In this message, Shehri tells the jihadist faithful that this climatic war will offer many opportunities for al Qaeda and that they should begin planning now how to exploit the conflict. Any sympathizer who has access to Arab leaders like the princes of the House of Saud, for example, should look for a chance to kill one in an act of terror reminiscent of the assassination of the “tyrant Anwar Sadat” in 1981. Any pilot in the Saudi air force or other Arab air forces who secretly supports the jihad should fly his plane into Israeli air space and try to blow up a target by smashing into it. Other practical ways to create terror and mayhem are laid out as well.

Al Qaeda has consistently said a struggle between Israel and Iran can only be good for the global Islamic jihad by blooding two of its enemies and forcing America to side with Israel. But this warning is the most vivid by far and comes with the most explicit instructions on how to exploit a new conflict.

Shehri tells his supporters that AQAP is ready for the next war. He says the “Shura Council of the Mujahedin in the Arabian Peninsula” has held a meeting to prepare for the coming apocalypse and is ready to act. AQAP has demonstrated in the last year that it can reach beyond Yemen to carry out its plans when it dispatched the suicide bomber who tried to blow up Northwest Flight 253 last Christmas. It has been active this summer in attacking intelligence officers of the Yemeni government and in publishing Inspire, the first al Qaeda journal in English on the Internet. General James Mattis, the new commander of Central Command, told the Senate this week that al Qaeda is putting significant pressure on the Yemeni government, already stretched by other internal problems and that there are “signs of decline in the capacity of Yemeni President Ali Abdallah Salih to control the situation.”

So why does al Qaeda want another war? Because it calculates an Israeli strike on Iran will prompt Iran to strike back against not only Israel but also the United States. Iran will attack American installations in the Gulf, encourage its proxies in Iraq and Afghanistan to attack Americans, and engage in a global terror campaign. In Lebanon, Hezbollah will start another war, raining missiles down on northern Israeli cities and towns and provoking Israeli airstrikes on Beirut and maybe even into Syria. Iran might even try to close the Strait of Hormuz and disrupt the global energy market. All this chaos and violence will make America even more unpopular in the Islamic world and open doors for al Qaeda to exploit. In this they are right, another war will be blamed on America rightly or wrongly. Shehri and his boss, Osama bin Laden, probably don’t really know if another war is in the making but they are almost certainly right that if it comes it will be good news for al Qaeda

Former Israeli chief rabbi: Abbas should perish

Filed under: Israel,Judaism,Middle East,Palestine,Religion — mungurk @ 19:08

source

Former Israeli chief rabbi calls Palestinians “evil, bitter enemies of Israel”.
Last Modified: 29 Aug 2010 16:33

The spiritual leader of Israel’s Shas party denounced upcoming talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority and wished for the death of Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas.

Ovadia Yosef, a former Israeli chief rabbi, called Palestinians “evil, bitter enemies of Israel” during his weekly sermon on Saturday.

“Abu Mazen and all these evil people should perish from this world,” he said, using Abbas’ common nickname. “God should strike them with a plague, them and these Palestinians.”

Saeb Erekat, the chief negotiator for the PA, said Yosef’s remarks were tantamount to a call for “genocide against Palestinians”.

The 89-year-old Yosef is a respected scholar among Jews of Middle Eastern and North African descent.

He has made similarly offensive comments before: He has referred to Arabs as “vipers,” and in a 2001 sermon during the Jewish holiday of Passover, he called for Israel to “annihilate” Arabs.

“It is forbidden to be merciful to them. You must send missiles to them and annihilate them,” he said. “They are evil and damnable.”

Yosef’s provocations are not limited to Arabs, either: In 2005, he blamed Hurricane Katrina on the “godlessness” of New Orleans, and on former US president George Bush’s support for Israel’s disengagement from Gaza. And last year, he criticised women who pray at the Western Wall as “stupid”.

‘An insult’ to talks

Erekat also called Yosef’s comments “an insult to all our efforts to advance the negotiations process”.

Abbas is scheduled to meet this week with Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, for their first direct negotiations in more than 18 months. Both men will attend a dinner in Washington on Wednesday hosted by US president Barack Obama, and then will meet on Thursday for talks.

Israel’s Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper reported that other PA officials were dismissive of Yosef’s remarks.

Netanyahu’s office issued a short statement distancing the Israeli premier from Yosef’s remarks.

“These comments do not reflect prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu or the Israeli government’s stance,” the statement said. “Israel is engaging in negotiations out of a desire to reach an agreement with the Palestinians.”

Yosef is the spiritual adviser of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party, which holds 11 seats in the Israeli Knesset. Eli Yishai, the head of the party, is the current interior minister.

Yishai said on Wednesday that he would not support an extension of Netanyahu’s 10-month West Bank settlement freeze, which is due to expire on September 26. Shas party officials said earlier this month that Yishai would do “everything possible” to persuade Netanyahu not to extend the freeze.

August 26, 2010

Iran ready to sell arms to Lebanon

Filed under: Iran,Lebanon,Middle East,Military,Terrorism,groups.Hezbollah — mungurk @ 10:04

source

Iran’s defence minister has said his country is prepared to sell weapons to Lebanon should it ask for help to equip its military.

General Ahmad Vahidi on Wednesday said Lebanon “is our friend” and that Iran is ready to offer military aid.

“If there is a demand in this respect, we are ready to help that country and conduct weapons transactions with it,” he was quoted as saying by the official Irna news agency.

Vahidi’s comments come a day after Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, the Hezbollah leader, proposed the Lebanese government formally seek military assistance from Iran.

Nasrallah vowed in a televised speech on Tuesday that his Iranian-backed group could help secure the aid for Lebanon’s poorly-equipped army.

‘Friendly assistance’

“I vow that Hezbollah will work fervently and capitalise on its friendship with Iran to ensure it helps arm the Lebanese military in any way it can,” he said.

Nasrallah, whose movement is backed by Iran and Syria, made the call following a US freeze in its military aid to Lebanon in the wake of deadly border clashes between Lebanese and Israeli troops.

A US legislator earlier this month suspended $100m of military aid to Lebanon over concerns the weapons could be used to attack Israel, and that Hezbollah may have influence over the Lebanese army.

In Washington Mark Toner, a US state department spokesman, said the possibility of Iranian arms sales to Lebanon underscore “the importance both to our national security and the security of the region to continue with our security assistance to the Lebanese army”.

Toner said a review of the aid programme to Lebanon was under way and that “we hope to conclude that soon and renew assistance”.

The Lebanese army is still seen as under-equipped compared to Hezbollah.

August 22, 2010

Iran president unveils drone bomber

Filed under: Iran,Middle East,Military,WMD — mungurk @ 22:35

source

Iran president unveils drone bomber

(UKPA) – 2 hours ago

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has unveiled Iran’s first domestically-built unmanned bomber aircraft, calling it an “ambassador of death” to the country’s enemies.

The 4m-long drone aircraft can carry up to four cruise missiles and will have a range of 620 miles, according to a state TV report – but not far enough to reach arch-enemy Israel.

“The jet, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship,” Mr Ahmadinejad said at the inauguration ceremony in Tehran.

The goal of the aircraft, named Karrar or striker, was to keep the enemy paralysed in its bases, he said, adding that the aircraft was for deterrence and defensive purposes.

The president championed the country’s military self-sufficiency programme and said it would continue “until the enemies of humanity lose hope of ever attacking the Iranian nation”.

Iran launched an arms development programme during its 1980-88 war with Iraq to compensate for a US weapons embargo and now produces its own tanks, armoured personnel carries, missiles and even a fighter plane.

It frequently makes announcements about new advances in military technology that cannot be independently verified.

State TV later showed video footage of the plane taking off from a launching pad and reported that the craft travelled at speeds of 560mph and could alternatively be armed with two 250lb bombs or a 450lb guided bomb.

Iran has been producing its own light, unmanned surveillance aircraft since the late 1980s.

The ceremony came a day after Iran began to fuel its first nuclear power reactor, with the help of Russia, amid international concerns over the possibility of a military dimension to its nuclear programme. Iran insists it is only interested in generating electricity.

August 18, 2010

Venezuela’s Communists want ‘Carlos the Jackal’ repatriated

source

CARACAS, Venezuela | Venezuela’s Communist Party has urged the government to seek the repatriation of convicted terrorist “Carlos the Jackal,” who is serving a life sentence in France for murder.

Party representative Pedro Eusse said President Hugo Chavez’s administration should ask France to let “Carlos” serve the remainder of his sentence in his homeland.

The Venezuelan-born prisoner, whose real name is Ilich Ramirez Sanchez, is not getting adequate health care in France, and authorities there are denying his right to communicate with lawyers, Mr. Eusse charged.

“They have violated his human rights, he’s been incommunicado,” he said at a news conference on Monday.

Mr. Eusse described Ramirez’s health as “delicate,” without giving any details.

There was no immediate comment from France’s government about Mr. Eusse’s charges or from officials in Mr. Chavez’s administration on the Communist Party’s petition.

Ramirez is serving a life sentence for the 1975 murders in Paris of two French investigators and Michel Moukharbal, a Lebanese man who was an informant for the French government.

He also has been blamed for a series of Cold War-era bombings, assassinations and hostage dramas, including the 1976 hijacking of an Air France jet en route to Uganda.

He has testified that he led a 1975 attack that killed three people at the headquarters of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries in Vienna, Austria. Venezuela’s then-Oil Minister Valentin Hernandez Acosta was one of the 70 hostages seized by the attackers and later freed in Algeria.

Ramirez was captured in Khartoum, Sudan, in 1994 and hauled in a sack to Paris by French secret service agents. Venezuela’s government has questioned whether Ramirez’s rights were violated when he was abducted and whisked away to France.

It wasn’t known how Mr. Chavez’s administration would react to the Communist Party’s petition. Telephone calls to Venezuela’s Foreign Ministry seeking comment from government officials went unanswered.

Mr. Chavez has praised Ramirez in the past as a “revolutionary fighter,” saying he selflessly joined the Palestinian struggle as a member of the Palestine Liberation Organization. The comment raised concerns among Jewish groups such as the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which said Mr. Chavez condoned terrorism by eulogizing Ramirez.

Clerics responsible for Iran’s failed attempts at democracy

Filed under: Iran,Middle East — mungurk @ 08:59

source

Ray Takeyh

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

The dramatic tale of malevolent Americans plotting a coup against Mossadeq, the famed Operation Ajax, has been breathlessly told so much that it has become a verity. To be fair, the cast of characters is bewildering: Kermit Roosevelt, the scion of America’s foremost political family, paying thugs to agitate against the hapless Mossadeq; American operatives shoring up an indecisive monarch to return from exile and reclaim his throne; Communist firebrands and nationalist agitators participating in demonstrations financed by the United States. As Iran veered from crisis to crisis, the story goes, Roosevelt pressed a reluctant officer corps to end Mossadeq’s brief but momentous democratic tenure.

Yet this fable conceals much about the actual course of events. In 1953 Iran was in the midst of an economic crisis. An oil embargo had been imposed after Tehran nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Co., and by that summer, the situation had fractured Mossadeq’s ruling coalition. Middle-class Iranians concerned about their finances gradually began to abandon Mossadeq. The merchant class was similarly anguished about the financial consequences of Mossadeq’s stubborn unwillingness to resolve the stalemate with the British. The intelligentsia and the professional classes were wary of the prime minister’s increasingly autocratic tendencies. Rumors of military coups began circulating as members of the armed forces grew vocal in their frustrations with the prime minister and began participating in political intrigues.

Not just the stars but an array of Iranian society was aligning against Mossadeq.

Now, the CIA was indeed actively seeking to topple Mossadeq. It had made contact that spring with the perennially indecisive shah and Iranian officers, including Gen. Fazollah Zahedi, an opportunistic officer who sought the premiership himself. Roosevelt had laid out a plan in which the shah would issue a monarchical decree dismissing Mossadeq; it was to be served to him on Aug. 15. But the commander who was to deliver the message was arrested, and the plot quickly unraveled.

This is where the story takes a twist. As word of the attempted coup spread, the shah fled Iran and Zahedi went into hiding. Amazingly, U.S. records declassified over the past decade indicate, the United States had no backup plan. Washington was largely prepared to concede. State Department and CIA cables acknowledge the collapse of their subversive efforts.

But while crestfallen Americans may have been prepared to forfeit their mission, the Iranian armed forces and the clergy went on to unseat Mossadeq. The senior clerics’ reaction to the developing nationalist crisis was always one of suspicion and concern. The clergy had always been averse to the modernizing penchants of secular politicians such as Mossadeq and their quests for republican rule and liberalization. The mullahs much preferred the deference of the conservative, if vacillating, shah to the secular enterprise of Mossadeq. After the attempted coup, the esteemed men of religion in Qom gave their tacit endorsement to the speaker of Parliament, Ayatollah Kashani. Through their connections with the bazaar and their ability to galvanize the populace, they were instrumental in orchestrating the demonstrations that engulfed Tehran. Mossadeq was already isolated. As the street protests tilted toward the shah, the military stepped in and displaced Mossadeq. A few days after the failure of the CIA’s putsch, the shah returned to Iran amid national celebration.

Through all of this, Roosevelt and his conspirators were more surprised observers then active instigators. Roosevelt’s most significant contribution to Iranian history was to publish an embellished account of his misadventures more than two decades after the coup. This flawed account went on to define the debate and capture the popular imagination — even though, in reality, Washington was caught flat-footed about how to respond to events in Tehran. President Dwight Eisenhower conceded to his diary after hearing Roosevelt’s account, “I listened to his detailed report and it seemed more like a dime novel than historical fact.”

American politicians have a penchant for acknowledging guilt and apologizing for past misdeeds. But responsibility for the suffocation of the Iranian peoples’ democratic aspirations in the summer of 1953 lies primarily with those who went on to squash another democratic movement in the summer of 2009 — the mullahs. It is they who should apologize to the Iranian people.

The writer is a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.

August 17, 2010

Ex-Israeli Soldier’s Photos Condemned

Filed under: Israel,Middle East,Palestine,Prisoner Policy — mungurk @ 09:22

source

Ex-Israeli Soldier’s Photos Condemned

By ETHAN BRONNER
Published: August 16, 2010

TEL AVIV — An Israeli woman who completed her military service last year posted photographs of herself from the army posing with blindfolded and bound Palestinian prisoners under the title “The Army … The Most Beautiful Time of My Life,” producing enraged commentary on the Internet and condemnation from the military.

The woman, Eden Abergil, from the southern city of Ashdod, is seen in the pictures, posted on her Facebook page, smiling next to the prisoners.

A few friends on her page praised the pictures, including one who wrote, “You look so sexy like that.” Ms. Abergil’s reply, using the shorthand of the medium, was, “Yeah I know lol honey. What a day it was. Look how he completes my picture. I wonder if he’s got Facebook!”

After an Israeli Web site posted the selections from the page, angry commentary ensued. The Israeli military issued a statement saying: “This was shameful behavior by the soldier. In light of the fact that she was discharged last year, all of the details have been turned over to the commanders for further attention.”

Generally, acts done while in military service can be prosecuted, but a spokesman said that since Ms. Abergil had been discharged last year, legal action remained unclear. The Public Committee Against Torture, an Israeli group, said that abusive behavior by soldiers was the norm at West Bank checkpoints and at detention centers.

Several bloggers who asked Ms. Abergil for comment were turned away. She also changed her Facebook settings to block outsiders.

Israel to refuse to stop building settlements

Filed under: Israel,Middle East,Palestine,groups.Hamas — mungurk @ 08:48

source

Israel to refuse to stop building settlements

Israel is to reject demands to halt the construction of new settlements, in a move likely to complicate the resumption of direct peace talks.

Refusing to stop building new settlements runs against a key condition set by the Quartet of Middle East mediators for talks to begin.

Officials said they would only respond favourably to an invitation to talks without preconditions, snubbing the Quartet. The Quartet is made up of the United Nations, the United States, the European Union, and Russia

Israels decision will put more pressure on the Palestinian leader, President Mahmoud Abbas, who had also demanded settlement building be frozen but looks likely to enter talks anyway.

Israeli officials say they expect a separate invitation will be issued shortly by the United States without preconditions, allowing the relaunch of the direct negotiations which were broken off when Israel forces invaded Gaza in December 2008.

The Quartet is expected to issue its call for the resumption of face-to-face talks in the coming days.

Its statement will reportedly call for Israel to halt settlement construction and agree to the creation of a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, with east Jerusalem as its capital.

The Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and senior ministers decided to reject the Quartet terms of reference at a meeting on Sunday night.

“The Quartet declaration will likely be a fig leaf for stipulating preconditions on the part of the Palestinians, and this is unacceptable to us,” a senior official said.

Since May, indirect talks have been conducted through the US envoy, George Mitchell, who has been shuttling between Jerusalem and Ramallah, the seat of the Palestinian authority.

They were made possible by a partial, 10-month moratorium on buildingwhich expires on September 26th.

The Arab League has already given Mr Abbas a green light to enter direct talks at a time he sees fit, but that decision will further undermine his position with more radical Palestinians, including Hamas, which runs Gaza.

Hamas and 10 other groups issued a statement in Damascus declaring their opposition to the resumption of direct negotiations.

A joint statement accused the US of backing Israeli plans to expand settlements, control Jerusalem and maintain the blockade on Gaza.

Older Posts »
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Powered by WordPress