Signal, No Noise

May 24, 2010

Former CIA officer on Iran: Brazil and Turkey are vital checks and balances

source

Former CIA on Iran: Brazil and Turkey are vital international checks and balances

Shouldn’t the world welcome the actions of two significant, responsible, democratic, and rational states to intervene and help check the foolishnesses of decades of US policy on Iran?


By Graham E. Fuller
posted May 24, 2010 at 1:14 pm EDT

Washington —If Washington thinks it now faces complications on getting United Nations Security Council sanctions against Iran, that’s not the half of it. A greater obstacle is the subtle change introduced into international power relationships by the actions of Brazil and Turkey that has accompanied it.

These two medium-size powers, Brazil and Turkey, have just challenged the guiding hand of Washington in determining nuclear strategy towards Iran. They undertook their own initiative to persuade Iran to accede to a deal on the handling of nuclear fuel issues. Not only was that initiative entirely independent, it moved ahead in the face of fairly crude American warnings to both states not to contemplate it – even though it closely paralleled one offered to Iran last year that fell through, mainly due to Iranian maneuvering and its fundamental distrust of Washington’s intent and blustering style.

Adding insult to injury, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan both had the temerity to actually succeed in their negotiations with Iran while Washington was publicly predicting their certain (and hoped for) failure.

Are the Iranians simply engaging in another con game, playing for time – a maneuver at which they excel? Or has something more profound taken place?

First, it is not only the terms of the deal that matter, but the messengers and atmospherics. Washington for decades has dealt with Iran – almost always indirectly – with considerable truculence and belligerence as the background music to “negotiations.” This is business as usual – the world’s sole superpower demanding others to agree to its strategy of the moment.

When Mr. Lula and Mr. Erdogan came to Tehran, the game was entirely different. It wasn’t the content so much as the negotiators, the venue, and the atmospherics. Tehran did not feel this time that it was acceding to superpower pressure, but to a reasoned and respectful request by two significant peer states in the world with no record of imperialism in Iran. In one sense, the deal was almost bound to succeed. What Iran wants as much as anything in this world is to blunt US dominance of the international order, and especially its ability to dictate terms in the Middle East.

If Iran is to yield at all on nuclear policy, what better device than to accede to two respected and successful states that were themselves defying Washington’s wishes in even attempting negotiations? If Tehran had refused that offer, it might have torpedoed the very concept of independent alternative, non-American efforts in international strategy. It made all the sense in the world for Iran to say “yes” this time to this combination of approach.

The same goes for China and Russia. After the Lula-Erdogan success, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton immediately proclaimed her own success at garnering Russian and Chinese support for enhanced sanctions against Iran – a stunningly insulting response to the remarkable accomplishment of Brazilian and Turkish negotiation. These states are, after all, immensely important to US regional and global interests. To blow them off like that was a major blunder, not just in terms of Iran, but in broader global strategy. The rest of the world has surely taken further negative note that Washington’s game remains depressingly familiar.

But do we really believe Clinton has in fact garnered Russian and Chinese support? Just as Tehran had every incentive to accept a proposal from “equals,” offered with respect instead of bluster and threats, so too Russia and China have every reason to welcome this initiative from Brazil and Turkey. Yes, the terms of the agreement do matter somewhat, but what is far more important for them is the slow but inexorable decay of US ability to deliver international diktats and to have its way. This is what Chinese and Russian foreign-policy strategy is all about. Neither of these countries will, in the end, permit the US hard-line approach to win out over the Brazilian-Turkish one in the Security Council, even if the Brazilian-Turkish deal requires a little tweaking. Russia and China champion the emergence of multiple sources of global power and influence that chip away at dying American unipolar power.

China and Russia, of course, represent the alternative polarity in the emerging struggle to end American hegemony in international affairs. But of greater moment, they now witness the political center in international politics shifting away from Washington as well. These two countries that defied American wishes are not just some Third World rabble-rousers scoring cheap points off the US. They are two major countries that are supposedly close friends of the US This makes the affront even crueler.

These events are profound signs of the times. The problem with unipolar power is that without checks and balances it invariably becomes subject to error and foolishness. On occasion, Americans actually believe in checks and balances when it comes to our own Constitution. Microsoft may be a great corporation, but nobody wants it to have a monopoly on IT.

Similarly in the world, international checks and balances are valuable safety valves. When Washington moves into its fourth decade of paralysis and incompetence in handling Iran, still unable even to speak to it – just as it cannot bring itself to talk to Cuba after 50 years – it has exacerbated the problem, strengthened Iran and the forces of radicalism in the Middle East, polarized emotions and, worst, failed in all respects. Shouldn’t the world welcome the actions of two significant, responsible, democratic, and rational states to intervene and help check the foolishnesses of decades of US policy? That is what checks and balances are all about and why the center is shifting.

And, who knows? “Rogue states” – a term beloved in Washington in reference to recalcitrant countries that don’t toe the Washington line – may more readily come to accede to new approaches free of the old imperial techniques of interventionism and ultimatums. Meanwhile, the US is rapidly running the risk of becoming its own “failed state” in terms of being able to exercise competent and effective international leadership since the fall of the Soviet Union.

Graham E. Fuller is the former vice chairman of the National Intelligence Council at the CIA and author of numerous books on international politics, including the forthcoming “A World Without Islam” (August 2010).

© 2010 Global Viewpoint Network/ Tribune Media Services. Hosted online by The Christian Science Monitor.

May 23, 2010

ETA members get 1,040 years each for Madrid bombing

Filed under: Europe,Southern Europe,Spain,Terrorism — mungurk @ 22:17

source

ETA members get 1,040 years each for Madrid bombing

May 21st, 2010
02:00 PM ET

[Updated at 2:00 p.m.] Spain’s highest court has sentenced three members of the Basque separatist group ETA to more than 1,000 years in prison for a terrorist attack against one of the nation’s busiest airports in 2006, officials said Friday.

Spain’s Audiencia Nacional, or National Court, sentenced Igor Portu, Mattin Sarasola and Mikel San Sebastian as the ones behind the powerful bomb attack on Madrid-Barajas Airport in December 2006. The attack resulted in the deaths of two Ecuadorian nationals.

They join several other ETA members who the courts have sentenced to 1000 years in prison even though the maximum that can be served in Spanish prison is 40 years. Spain has no death penalty.

Judge Alfonso Guevara, who presided over the trial, also ordered the defendants to pay 700,000 euros to the family of Diego Armando Estacio and 500,000 euros to the family of Carlos Alonso Palate, both killed during the attack.

The blast came in the midst of a unilateral cease-fire ETA had declared in March 2006. The cease-fire raised hopes at the time for an end to decades of ETA violence blamed for more than 800 deaths.

ETA – or Euskadi Ta Askatasuna, which in Basque means “Homeland and Freedom” – is one of Europe’s last separatist groups. The organization, pronounced “etta,” has sought independence for a Basque state in northern Spain and southwestern France since it was launched during Spain’s Franco dictatorship.

According to studies by the Council on Foreign Relations, ETA’s structure has fissured, and many members are attempting to enter the political process.

[Posted at 12:44 p.m.] A court has sentenced three members of the Basque separatist group ETA to 1,040 years each for their roles in a bombing that killed two people at the Madrid airport in 2006, according to CNN+ and EFE, the national news agency in Spain.

April 7, 2010

Pope Meets With Muslim Scholars

source

November 7, 2008

RENEE MONTAGNE, host:

Muslim and Catholic scholars held an unprecedented meeting at the Vatican. Over three days they vowed to work together to combat violence and terrorism, especially when carried out in God’s name. A joint declaration called for freedom of conscience but did not address the issue of conversion. NPR’s Sylvia Poggioli reports from Rome.

SYLVIA POGGIOLI: 58 scholars, 29 from each faith, gathered at the Vatican for an inter-religious dialogue under the theme ‘Love of God, Love of Neighbor.’ At a final public session the Muslim delegation spokesman Ibrahim Kalin(ph) read from the final declaration.

Mr. IBRAHIM KALIN (Spokesman, Muslim Delegation): We professed that Catholics and Muslims are called to be instruments of love and harmony among believers and for humanity as a whole. Renouncing any oppression, aggressive violence and terrorism, especially that committed in the name of religion and upholding the principle of justice for all.

POGGIOLI: The Muslim-Catholic forum came two years after Pope Benedict in a speech at Regensburg University in Germany used language that suggested Islam is violent and irrational. The words triggered angry protest in the Islamic world. Dozens of Muslim scholars then wrote a letter to the Pope refuting his statements and calling for better mutual understanding. It came to be known as the common initiative, gathering together 271 religious leaders and scholars from Sunni, Shiites, Sufi and other traditions in the Middle East, Asia, Africa, Europe, and North America. Ingrid Mattson, a convert who heads the largest Muslim organization in North America, said the initiative was born out of a sense of urgency that religion has become an unacceptable source of conflict.

Dr. INGRID MATTSON (Islamic Society of North America): Our misunderstandings have created conflict and tension in the world in a way that has alarmed us. And we feel a sense of shame that our sacred faiths are the reason or the justification for such conflicts.

POGGIOLI: Earlier in the day Pope Benedict told the forum there is a great and vast field in which we can act together in defending and promoting the moral values which are part of our common heritage. And he called on both faiths to resolve to overcome past prejudices and to correct the often distorted images of the other which even today can create difficulties in our relations. At the final public session, French Catholic scholar Joseph Maila(ph) pointed out however that neither side would compromise on issues of theology.

Mr. JOSEPH MAILA (French Catholic Scholar): (Through Translator) Our dialogue is not an amiable exchange; we’re affirming our convictions, not opinions. This are our beliefs, these are the essence of our lives. We’re not ready to make concessions about our faith or our roots.

POGGIOLI: Asked by a reporter why the thorny issue of conversion was missing from the joint statement, Seyyed Hossein Nasr, an Iranian Muslim scholar at George Washington University, said in the past Muslims had been killed for converting to another faith, because in the Muslim world Islam was closely allied to the state and therefore conversion was tantamount to treason. He said many Muslim jurors are now redefining the concept of apostasy. The Vatican is particularly concerned about repression of Christian minorities in some Islamic countries, but the Muslim delegation did not include any participants from Saudi Arabia, a country which does not allow worship of non-Muslim religions. And at the final session Ramsey Das(ph), an Iraqi Christian, said that Christians are being forced to flee Iraq in Palestinian territories and are now an endangered species.

Mr. RAMSEY DAS (Iraqi Christian): We are now dying. We are being subjected to genocide. We are being subjected to conversion.

POGGIOLI: But the Iranian scholar Seyyed Hossein Nasr said the prosecution of Christians in the Middle East is small compared to that of Muslims in Bosnia in the Balkan Wars of the 1990s, and he blamed the current violence against Christians in the Middle East on the Bush administration.

Professor SEYYED HOSSEIN NASR (George Washington University): Unfortunately, tragically, because the Middle East became crushed under the pressure of a power which the ordinary people associate with Christianity.

POGGIOLI: The Catholic-Muslim forum will now meet every two years and the two delegations agreed to study the possibility of creating a permanent community to deal jointly with conflicts and emergency situations such as the 2006 Danish cartoons of the prophet Muhammad that sparked violent protest in the Islamic word. Sylvia Poggioli, NPR News, Rome.

March 18, 2010

South Korea Signs Agreement to Build Nuclear Plant in Turkey

source

POWERnews
A preliminary move on March 10 puts Turkey closer than ever to building its first nuclear power plant. The plant, which would consist of four reactors with a total 5,600 MW capacity, would be built in northern Turkey on the Black Sea coast.

Though details remain to be worked out, the protocol between two state-owned power companies—Korean Electric Power Corp. (KEPCO) and Elektrik Üretim (EUAS)—is big news for both countries. Turkey has long wanted a nuclear plant, but setbacks of various kinds, including financing problems and concern about earthquake faults, have thwarted all previous attempts at moving past the wishing stage. For its part, KEPCO has been actively working to develop plants beyond its home borders and has announced a goal of exporting 80 reactors, worth $400 billion, by 2030.

In an interview with the Financial Times, Turkish Energy Minister Taner Yildiz said he wanted nuclear power to generate 10% of his country’s electricity by 2020.

The Financial Times also reported that KEPCO and a Turkish construction group, Enka Insaat ve Sanayi, would form a 50-50 joint venture to construct the plant.

Though most news sources reported on the agreement as essentially a done deal, the Anatolia news agency quoted Yildiz as saying, “If any company from the United States, Canada, Japan, France makes a proposal, we are open to work similarly with them.”

Since January, Turkey has been working with the Russian Federation to build a nuclear plant in Akkuyu, in southern Turkey, on the Mediterranean. That project has been fraught with controversy from its original inception in 2000. Given KEPCO’s aggressive goals and schedules, it’s possible that its planned project could come online before the Russian one.

Sources: POWERnews, UPI, Today’s Zaman, Financial Times, AFP

March 17, 2010

March 16, 2010

Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez defends suspected ETA terrorists wanted in Spain

source

Chavez defends ETA suspects wanted in Spain

By The Associated Press

Monday, March 15, 2010 at 6:05 p.m.

CARACAS, Venezuela — President Hugo Chavez on Monday defended a group of Basque separatists who arrived in Venezuela years ago, saying he is certain they aren’t involved in terrorism.

A Spanish judge is seeking the arrest of six members of the Basque separatist group ETA and six Colombian rebels for a variety of alleged crimes, saying many of them are likely in Venezuela or Cuba.

Chavez noted several ETA members were allowed to come to Venezuela under a 1989 with Spain’s government after peace talks with the separatist group broke down.

“They’re Venezuelans now. They were married here, had children and even grandchildren, and we’re sure they aren’t participating in any terrorist activity,” Chavez said.

Tensions have risen between the two countries since Spanish Judge Eloy Velasco announced an investigation turned up evidence that Chavez’s government facilitated collaboration between ETA and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC. Both groups are classified as terrorist organizations by the European Union and the United States.

Chavez has denied any links and said the accusations are false.

The socialist leader said Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero is under pressure from right-wing politicians and the press. He warned that “if they let themselves be taken by those pressures and they disrespect us in some way, well that would harm relations again like when the king told me to shut up.”

Spain and Venezuelan managed to smooth over a 2007 rift after King Juan Carlos told Chavez “why don’t you shut up?” during a summit. The comment came after the Venezuelan leader repeatedly criticized former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar.

Chavez said if Spain puts relations in danger, “it would be highly regrettable – all the investments Spain has in Venezuela – oil, gas. Spain would be the one that would come out losing.”

The ETA suspects wanted by the Spanish judge include Arturo Cubillas Fontan, who is accused of playing a key role in ETA-FARC cooperation in Venezuela. Chavez did not mention Cubillas, who previously held a post in Venezuela’s agriculture ministry.

The Associated Press

February 23, 2010

A “Model” Islamic Education From Turkey?

Filed under: Europe,Islam,Religion,Southern Europe,Turkey — mungurk @ 23:40

source

By REUTERS February 23, 2010

ISTANBUL (Reuters) – In the Beyoglu Anadolu religious school in Istanbul, gilded Korans line the shelves and on a table lies a Turkish translation of “Eclipse,” a vampire-based fantasy romance by U.S. novelist Stephanie Meyer.

No-one inside the school would have you believe this combination of Islamic and western influences demonstrates potential to serve as a ‘moderate’ educational antidote to radical Islam.

But there is fresh outside interest in schools like this, which belong to the network known as imam-hatip.

Some people, particularly officials from Afghanistan and Pakistan, have suggested the Turkish system can light the way to a less extremist religious education for their young Muslims.

The interest is understandable. The imam-hatip network is a far cry from the western stereotype of the madrassa as an institution that teaches the Koran by rote and little else.

Originally founded to educate Muslim religious functionaries in the 1920s, the imam-hatip syllabus devotes only around 40 percent of study to religious subjects like Arabic, Islamic jurisprudence and rhetoric. The rest is given over to secular topics.

The network has incubated the elite of the Islamist-rooted AK party which came to power in Turkey in 2002. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan — who went on to study economics — and around one third of his party’s MPs attended imam-hatip schools.

For Turks, however, it’s ironic that a system which for over a decade has been suppressed by the military enforcers of secularism could be seen to champion any institutional accommodation between the Islamic and the secular.

A revised system of university credits introduced in the late 1990s puts imam-hatip students seeking to study non-religious subjects at university at a disadvantage.

“It’s very interesting that these schools that are so controversial in our own country have become role models elsewhere,” said Iren Ozgur, a Turkish-American academic at New York University who has studied the imam-hatip system.

In his office close to the Golden Horn inlet of the Bosphorus, former imam-hatip pupil Huseyin Korkut believes the schools could work abroad if they remain true to “Islamic values.” But he bristles at the idea of the network being pigeonholed into helping solve international security problems.

“We are disturbed by this understanding that these schools would educate ‘soft’ Muslims that could easily adapt to the needs and requirements of the international authorities,” said the moustachioed economist. Calling himself a typical graduate of the system, Korkut works at Kirklareli University and is general director of the imam-hatip alumnae association.

Current students like Kerem Fazil Cinar, an 18-year-old final year pupil at Beyoglu Anadolu imam-hatip School, see the system as a refuge from the perils of the outside world.

“In the regular school would be the danger of meeting dangerous friends who have not inherited religious values,” said the earnest, bespectacled teenager, the beginnings of a beard sprouting from his chin.

“The environment would be more degenerate.”

SECULAR FOCUS

Named after the preachers and prayer-leaders it was set up to train, the imam-hatip system has earned less media attention in the west than the moderate international network set up by exiled Islamic scholar Fethullah Gulen. There are many Gulen schools in Central Asia, and other outposts in the Balkans and Western Europe.

Last month, Afghanistan’s Education Minister Farooq Wardak visited an imam-hatip school in Ankara and declared the system could be a model for moderate religious education in his country. Pakistan’s ambassador to Turkey has said the imam-hatip system was discussed in recent high-level talks. And Wardak’s visit followed a Russian delegation, including the deputy minister of education, which came to see the schools last year.

“An education system should not just be an education, it should be a tool to fight extremism,” Wardak said, adding that he was impressed by the way the imam-hatip school combined religious instruction with other subjects.

“We need to make sure that graduates of religious schools … also have skills and vocation, and they get a knowledge to be part of the mainstream of society.”

Overseas interest in the schools may also have been partly kindled by Turkey’s changing foreign policy priorities, as Ankara seeks to play a greater role among Muslim states — including Syria and Iran — and cools on long-term ally Israel.

Turkey’s largest ever foreign aid effort is now directed to Afghanistan, and last year it agreed to establish a high-level co-operation council with Pakistan. Russia is Turkey’s main trading partner.

In imam-hatip institutions, as in every school in the country, images of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk — the founder of the Turkish Republic — are on display. Students can tackle Arabic passages describing the Prophet Mohammad’s journey to Medina in classrooms also displaying Ataturk’s address to Turkish youth.

“There has always been a tension between orthodoxy and heterodoxy within the framework of Turkish Islam,” said Professor M. Hakan Yavuz, of the University of Utah’s Middle East Centre.

“As a result Turkish Islam has these sites outside the control of orthodox Islam, and remains more pluralist, more tolerant.”

SENSITIVE

But by singling out imam-hatip schools, Afghanistan’s minister may unwittingly have been treading on deep Turkish sensitivities.

The network — which with high standards and low costs proved popular with conservative Turkish families in the past — was targeted after senior generals pushed out Turkey’s first Islamist-led government in 1997.

Whereas in the second half of the 1990s about 600 imam-hatip schools across the country educated half a million pupils, after what was known as the “post-modern coup,” imam-hatip middle schools for pupils aged 11-14 were abolished.

Even more damaging were the changes to the university admission system, which calculates the relevance of subjects studied at school to a student’s proposed university course. Modifications after 1997 meant that — unless they chose to study religion — imam-hatip students found their grades devalued against those of applicants from conventional schools.

Waning prospects for higher education diminished the appeal of imam-hatip schools. Today around 450 educate 120,000 pupils. The AKP has worked towards their rehabilitation, but it has not succeeded yet in changing university entrance requirements.

ANGER

It is in this context that students like Cinar experience the system. Gathered in a mosque in the heart of the old city with two fellow students — including Nur Sumeyye Karaoglan, a quiet girl in a patterned headscarf — the young man’s comments reflect an anger with Turkey’s secular establishment that makes nonsense of such distinctions as “radical” and moderate.”

“Surely religion should have a public role,” he said — a view that flies in the face of Turkey’s 87 years of secularism. “Not only in Turkey, but throughout the world.”

Sitting among glass-walled cloisters, he warmed to the theme of Turkey’s suppression of the imam-hatip network, and by extension of its alumni, saying his country needed men like him to stand up for religion and traditional values.

“We want Turkish society to feel that it is right to fear us,” he said.

Over their tea, his fellow pupils murmured in approval.

“I am very proud to be an imam-hatip student,” said Karaoglan, 16, the only girl in the group. “I feel it is in line with human nature.”

(Editing by Sara Ledwith)

January 14, 2010

Greece: “Conspiracy of the Cells of Fire” claims Parliament bomb

Filed under: Europe,Greece,Southern Europe,Terrorism — mungurk @ 16:08

source
Terror group alliance claims Parliament bomb
Wednesday January 13, 2010

SIMELA PANTZARTZI/ANA

Policemen patrol the area in front of Parliament where a bomb exploded on Saturday night. In a proclamation posted on the Internet yesterday the Conspiracy of the Cells of Fire and the little-known Terrorist Guerrilla Group claimed responsibility for the bloodless attack. The same groups had claimed a blast at an insurance firm on December 27. The proclamation, titled ‘Democracy will not win,’ calls on police to release three suspected members of the group.

January 7, 2010

Italy: Bomb attack signals a new ‘mafia campaign’

Filed under: Europe,Italy,Southern Europe,Terrorism — mungurk @ 08:06

source

Rome, 5 Jan. (AKI) – The Calabrian mafia used this week’s attack on a southern Italian court building to signal a “military campaign” against the judiciary, according to internationally acclaimed author Roberto Saviano.

On Sunday, a powerful homemade bomb partially exploded at the courthouse in the southern city of Reggio Calabria in an attack blamed on the Calabrian mafia, which is also known as ‘Ndrangheta.

“If they had wanted to do it, the clans could have blown up all of Reggio Calabria,” Saviano said. “‘Ndrangheta possesses c3 and c4 (plastic) explosives. Dozens of bazooka (rocket launchers).

“Why then did they explode a home-made bomb in front of the prosecutor’s office? Obviously they did not want to strike severely, but to launch the first signal, to begin a ‘military campaign’,” he said.

Saviano, journalist and author of the top-selling book ‘Gomorrah’, which has also been made into a highly-successful film, published his views in the Italian daily La Repubblica on Tuesday.

The 30-year-old author, who lives in hiding under a 24-hour escort, has consistently argued that the mafia was fighting a war in southern Italy every day and that many of victims of organised crime were under the age of 35.

Referring to the attack in Calabria he said it was important to discuss every aspect of it and the desire of the mafia to prevail above all else.

“We need to understand, speak about it, give visibility to Calabria, to the dynamics that link businesses, crime, Freemasonry, and politics in an intertwined culture that generates billions of euros of which none is invested in Calabria and all is invested abroad,” he said.

Saviano cited the worldwide reach of ‘Ndrangheta from the Canadian city of Montreal to Sydney in Australia to indicate how vast its criminal network had spread.

Greece Arrests 26 – Year – Old Man Over Bomb Attacks

Filed under: Europe,Greece,Southern Europe,Terrorism — mungurk @ 08:05

source

January 5, 2010
By REUTERS

Filed at 12:56 p.m. ET

ATHENS (Reuters) – Greek police arrested a man on Tuesday on suspicion of being a member of a leftist guerrilla group which has claimed a series of bomb attacks over the past year.

Police said they had been searching for Nikos Bakopoulos, 26, since he and other suspects were charged by a prosecutor for being members of the Fire Conspiracy Cells group following a police raid in September on a flat in which a bomb was found.

Under Greek anti-terrorism law, he faces life imprisonment if convicted.

“The police arrested him in the centre of Athens,” a police official, who declined to be named, said.

“The warrant was issued after his fingerprints were found in a flat in (the northern Athens suburb of) Halandri where a bomb and material to make bombs were found.”

Greece has suffered a string of anarchist and leftist attacks aimed at businesses, police and public buildings since the police shooting of a teenager in December 2008 triggered the country’s worst riots in decades, fuelled by economic hardships.

Fire Conspiracy Cells claimed responsibility for a powerful blast which wrecked the ground floor of the National Insurance building and smashed the windshields of five cars parked nearby at the end of December.

The group previously was known for small explosions with gas canisters and homemade bombs against government buildings and politicians’ homes and offices.

(Reporting by Lefteris Papadimas; Writing by Ingrid Melander; Editing by Michael Roddy)

December 10, 2009

Ransom paid for Greek ship

source

December 10 2009 at 10:06AM
Mogadishu – Somali pirates holding a Greek-owned vessel since May said a $2,5-million (about R15-million) ransom was finally paid on Thursday and the MV Ariana and its crew of 24 Ukrainians would be freed shortly.

“The deal is now complete, the ransom money was delivered to us early this morning and the ship will be released within minutes,” Mohamed Ilkaase, a member of the pirate gang holding the MV Ariana, told AFP by phone from the coastal town of Hobyo.

The Maltese-flagged vessel was seized on May 2 en route from the Middle East to Brazil with 10 000 tons of soya beans and was one of the longest-running hostage situations off the coast of Somalia.

“This ship had been in our hands for some time now and there had been disagreements over the ransom in recent weeks,” Ilkaase said. “But finally, we agreed to a ransom of $2,5-million to free the ship.”

Abdi Yare, a pirate leader based in the neighbouring pirate lair of Harardhere, confirmed information that the MV Ariana’s release was imminent.

“That ship will be released this morning, the ransom money was paid this morning at 6.00am (03.00 GMT),” he said.

Another pirate had announced on November 26 that the ship was being released for $3,7-million but last-minute snags emerged over the ransom and the pirates held on to the vessel and its crew.

The ship is owned by the Athens-based All Ocean Shipping company, which is in turn owned by a British conglomerate. Neither immediately confirmed the release of the MV Ariana.

Somali pirates are also currently holding a Greek-flagged vessel, the 330-metre crude carrier Marav Centaurus, which was hijacked on November 29 with a crew of 16 Filipinos, nine Greeks, two Ukrainians and a Romanian. – Sapa-AFP

Older Posts »
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Powered by WordPress